2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethanol production from kitchen waste using the flocculating yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain KF-7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
39
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dry mass of food waste was mainly composed of starch sugars, protein, fat and cellulose, which could be regarded as a suitable substrate for ethanol production. These characteristics were very similar to others that have been reported (Sakai et al 2000;Shin et al 2004;Tang et al 2008). Figure 1a shows the enzymatic digestibility index has increased from 0.73 to 0.78 after 2.5 h of enzymatic hydrolysis with the increase of glucoamylase concentration from 80 to 100 u/g food waste, and 0.1 increase of digestibility index was found when glucoamylase concentration increased further to 120 u/g food waste.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Food Waste Mixturesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The dry mass of food waste was mainly composed of starch sugars, protein, fat and cellulose, which could be regarded as a suitable substrate for ethanol production. These characteristics were very similar to others that have been reported (Sakai et al 2000;Shin et al 2004;Tang et al 2008). Figure 1a shows the enzymatic digestibility index has increased from 0.73 to 0.78 after 2.5 h of enzymatic hydrolysis with the increase of glucoamylase concentration from 80 to 100 u/g food waste, and 0.1 increase of digestibility index was found when glucoamylase concentration increased further to 120 u/g food waste.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Food Waste Mixturesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar results have been obtained by Wilkins et al, (2007) who reported that ethanol production from simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of citrus peel waste by S. cerevisiae was greatest when the fermentation temperature and pH were adjusted to 37 ºC and 6.0, respectively. Besides, higher ethanol productivity from the kitchen waste using S. cerevisiae KF-7 as inoculum has been reported at the fermentation conditions of temperature (37 ºC) and pH (5.85) (Tang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Response Surface Plots and Optimization Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being enormously generated in the recycling facilities and very rich in sugar content (75 g/L, Table 1) FWL can be utilized as a potential substrate for the production of ethanol. Reports exist on the production of ethanol by fermentation of fresh kitchen garbage using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as inoculum (Tang et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008). However, FWL is different from fresh kitchen garbage being contaminated in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like large mothers, large daughter cells have shorter replicative life span (Kennedy 1994). And which confirm that, EI calorie restriction in which nutrient intake is restricted to 60-70 % that of voluntary levels increases life span in most species including mammals (Voet 1586;Tang et al 2008;Bai et al 2007). Then, targeting the increase in CGE by increasing the cell tD should not lead to aging of cells through EI calorie restriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Results of both methods were 97-100 % identical. Such promising identically have urged the author of this study to depend on the statistical analysis of those great scientists (Man et al 2011;Xin et al 2003;Phisalaphong et al 2005;Kadambiniguar 2006;Pena et al 1972;Diaz-Ricci et al 1992;Hill et al 1993;Douka 1999;Sprenger 1996;Moawad 2010;Moawad 2011a, b;Moawad 2012a, b;Austriaco 1996;Kennedy 1994;Voet 1586;Tang et al 2008;Bai et al 2007;Yadav et al 1997;Le Man et al 2008;Nahvi et al 2002;Le Man et al 2010;APHA 1998;Miller 1959;Lang et al 2005;Garda et al 2005) on purpose, regarding their results as a ''gold standard'' or fully accepted measurement against which to make a comparison to determine accuracy of the approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%