2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Challenges in Emerging Applications of Persuasive Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appeal of fitness tracking apps is not universal, some actively oppose or resist them, whilst others cite displeasure from the peer evaluation and surveillance that the apps entail and promote. Engagement with apps influences activity and whilst this may appear to be self-perpetuating others argue that changes are intended and scripted by the apps, who are ultimately seeking increased revenues through engagement (Timmer et al, 2015). There are fears that apps such as Strava could create hyperaware cyclists driven by obsession rather than enjoyment (Hargrave, 2013) resulting in problems relating to overtraining, overexertion and risk taking (Bader, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appeal of fitness tracking apps is not universal, some actively oppose or resist them, whilst others cite displeasure from the peer evaluation and surveillance that the apps entail and promote. Engagement with apps influences activity and whilst this may appear to be self-perpetuating others argue that changes are intended and scripted by the apps, who are ultimately seeking increased revenues through engagement (Timmer et al, 2015). There are fears that apps such as Strava could create hyperaware cyclists driven by obsession rather than enjoyment (Hargrave, 2013) resulting in problems relating to overtraining, overexertion and risk taking (Bader, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a user decides to purchase a digital fitness coach, we can assume this is of her own accord. However, when persuasive technology is used in the context of a working environment or in insurance, this issue becomes more problematic (Timmer et al 2015). It raises the question of whether the employer or insurer should be allowed to determine the standards for an employee or client's behavioural change, or if this is an infringement of their personal autonomy.…”
Section: Who Sets the Standards?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Id Theme [5] Awareness of unintended outcomes [6] Privacy and designer responsibility [22] Responsiblity and ethical consideration [24] [25] Morally acceptable [29] Ethical consideration of adaptable PT [30] Ethical framework gamification [35] Applicability of discourse ethics on PT [36] Applying discourse ethics on PT [42] Awareness -lack of understanding and commitment [43] Ethical acceptability of PT [45] PT design concerns privacy, autonomy, and coercion [47] Design guidelines by using discourse ethics [48] Awareness and a taxonomy for PT [49] Investigate the moral acceptability of machine persuasion [53] Autonomy and volunteerism to PT [55] Autonomy and volunteerism to PT [56] Critical design questions to assess value, action, and goal detail. In the second round, the whole paper was read and 18 papers fulfilled the key inclusion criteria, so had relevance for this research, see Table 1.…”
Section: Id Themementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers [45,53] are also interested in the volunteerism of PT . Timmer et al [53] wrote about an important ethical issues for PT, e.g., persuasive systems that are used at work could, depending on context and viewpoint, be seen as mandatory. Thus, the system use would not be perceived as voluntary, and group pressure at work could influence users.…”
Section: Id Themementioning
confidence: 99%