2019
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we found that researchers and REC members had similar views, with the exception of risk-benefit balance and selection of study participants; i.e., more REC members than researchers rated very important for these two issues. A previous study among similar groups of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand explored their opinions regarding ethical considerations of the research proposal and the informed-consent process in research in general, not particularly to challenge studies [19]. The results of that study identified more discrepancies of opinions between the two groups, including risk/benefit, vulnerability, confidentiality/privacy, communication of risks, decision-making authority for consent, process for approaching study participants, and the availability of a contact for study deviations/violations [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, we found that researchers and REC members had similar views, with the exception of risk-benefit balance and selection of study participants; i.e., more REC members than researchers rated very important for these two issues. A previous study among similar groups of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand explored their opinions regarding ethical considerations of the research proposal and the informed-consent process in research in general, not particularly to challenge studies [19]. The results of that study identified more discrepancies of opinions between the two groups, including risk/benefit, vulnerability, confidentiality/privacy, communication of risks, decision-making authority for consent, process for approaching study participants, and the availability of a contact for study deviations/violations [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study among similar groups of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand explored their opinions regarding ethical considerations of the research proposal and the informed-consent process in research in general, not particularly to challenge studies [19]. The results of that study identified more discrepancies of opinions between the two groups, including risk/benefit, vulnerability, confidentiality/privacy, communication of risks, decision-making authority for consent, process for approaching study participants, and the availability of a contact for study deviations/violations [19]. The present study suggests that the perceptions and concerns about challenge studies are general among researchers, and do not differ that much by research field or with experience as an REC member.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, themes were formulated from these categories. A sample of the transcripts was then given to participants to confirm whether their views had been captured clearly, and they all confirmed that the transcript was a true reflection of their experiences (Kaewkungwal & Adams 2019 ).…”
Section: Research Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When research is done using human data, ethical values and conduct should be taken into consideration. [87] In this research con dentiality of the information obtained from the respondents were done respecting their rights and privacy. Throughout the process the respondents were informed that this research would be done for academic purposes.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%