Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations: Navigating the Virtual Field

Abstract

Qualitative research is integral to the pandemic response. Qualitative methods are ideally suited to generating evidence to inform tailored, culturally appropriate approaches to COVID-19, and to meaningfully engaging diverse individuals and communities in response to the pandemic. In this paper, we discuss core ethical and methodological considerations in the design and implementation of qualitative research in the COVID-19 era, and in pivoting to virtual methods—online interviews and focus groups; internet-based archival research and netnography, including social media; participatory video methods, including photo elicitation and digital storytelling; collaborative autoethnography; and community-based participatory research. We identify, describe, and critically evaluate measures to address core ethical challenges around informed consent, privacy and confidentiality, compensation, online access to research participation, and access to resources during a pandemic. Online methods need not be considered unilaterally riskier than in-person data collection; however, they are clearly not the same as in-person engagement and require thoughtful, reflexive, and deliberative approaches in order to identify and mitigate potential and dynamically evolving risks. Ensuring the ethical conduct of research with marginalized and vulnerable populations is foundational to building evidence and developing culturally competent and structurally informed approaches to promote equity, health, and well-being during and after the pandemic. Our analysis offers methodological, ethical, and practical guidance in the COVID-19 pandemic and considerations for research conducted amid future pandemics and emergency situations.

An eHealth Intervention for Promoting COVID-19 Knowledge and Protective Behaviors and Reducing Pandemic Distress Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (#SafeHandsSafeHearts)

“…These may include transgender and gender nonbinary persons, people living with HIV, and those with no intervention effect on reducing psychological distress (n=12 per group). In-depth interviews will be conducted online in accordance with methodological recommendations and ethical considerations amid a pandemic [ 134 ]. A semistructured interview guide will be used to explore experiences in the pandemic, focal challenges and strengths, identified supports, and thoughts about the intervention.…”

The Ethnographic Quest in the Midst of COVID-19

“…Though we have hitherto conceived virtual inquiries as a double-edged sword of anthropological knowledge; however, the possibility to immaterially reach different socio-ecological contexts provides us with new forms of ethnographic reflection. By choosing thoughtfully online methods that abide by ethical considerations of research with marginalised communities ( Newman et al, 2021 ), we can safely surmount the biophysical uneasiness of seclusion and pathogenic infection. We should, nevertheless, make an intellectual effort to intersect the fieldwork memories and the images of different material temporalities.…”

Positionality in Information Studies Research of Visuality: Ethical and Epistemological Considerations

“…Clearly, the seductive nature of video‐based data helped convey a strong sense of immediate engagement and connection to traditional Storytellers. However, video recordings and images digitally published are impossible to retract and pose ethical challenges to the confidentiality and privacy of Storytellers, often subject to unconsented digital records being circulated and re‐circulated in perpetuity (Newman et al, 2021). While ethical issues of textual material can be solved using abbreviations, initials or pseudonyms, scientific criteria still grapple with Indigenous knowledge's visuality.…”