2002
DOI: 10.1177/107327480200900506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Considerations in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract: Bioethical decision making requires the integration of virtues with principles, followed by the application of these standards to each patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of the disease upon appearance and function are particularly difficult to reconcile, especially in the face of an inherently challenging patient cohort often exhibiting widely prevalent substance abuse and frequent social isolation . Concerns regarding appearance are by no means purely superficial, and aesthetic disfigurement and physiologic dysfunction are frequently interrelated to fundamental issues of identity among those with head and neck cancer …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of the disease upon appearance and function are particularly difficult to reconcile, especially in the face of an inherently challenging patient cohort often exhibiting widely prevalent substance abuse and frequent social isolation . Concerns regarding appearance are by no means purely superficial, and aesthetic disfigurement and physiologic dysfunction are frequently interrelated to fundamental issues of identity among those with head and neck cancer …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Algorithm for biomedical ethical decision-making (adapted from Schenck ( 38 ) and Botha et al ( 39 )). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immediate concern is clearly what is suitable for the woman medically, but that is followed closely by an attempt to understand the patient’s overall good—e.g., psychological good, good in terms of family and relations, spiritual good, and good in terms of the patient’s preceding life history and values. While ensuring the good of the woman is the primary aim, this is insufficient in itself, as the goods of fetus and others must also be considered ( 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the patient's perspective on what is or is not an intimate examination must be central during physical exam of the head and neck. [33] Several authors reviewed obtained Research Ethics Board approval for their study [18,24,25,29] yet many did not. Miser [34] distinguishes between curricular evaluation and education research and highlights the need to involve earlier in the process the ethics review board.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%