2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical considerations in the use of pre-mortem interventions to support deceased organ donation: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Safeguarding end‐of‐life experience for MAiD patients in the ODE context requires active monitoring, given the potential for changes to the benefit/harm balance with these, sick, vulnerable patients, unlike unconscious withdrawal of life‐sustaining therapy patients. Examples include burdensome assessments during their final days of life, painful interventions, the presence of unknown healthcare teams during MAiD, a different setting for MAiD, changes to the family's experience, and bereavement due to the removal of the body for several hours 59,77,92,95,99,100–116 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Safeguarding end‐of‐life experience for MAiD patients in the ODE context requires active monitoring, given the potential for changes to the benefit/harm balance with these, sick, vulnerable patients, unlike unconscious withdrawal of life‐sustaining therapy patients. Examples include burdensome assessments during their final days of life, painful interventions, the presence of unknown healthcare teams during MAiD, a different setting for MAiD, changes to the family's experience, and bereavement due to the removal of the body for several hours 59,77,92,95,99,100–116 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include burdensome assessments during their final days of life, painful interventions, the presence of unknown healthcare teams during MAiD, a different setting for MAiD, changes to the family's experience, and bereavement due to the removal of the body for several hours. 59 , 77 , 92 , 95 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 A recent review of the ethics of antemortem interventions did not discover any reports that described the impact of including antemortem details in a real-world donation registry. 49 However, in 2021, Scotland introduced opt-out legislation, 50 which assumes authorization to “type A” antemortem interventions (routine investigations, eg, blood sampling, ultrasound scanning), but additional authorization is required from the SDM for “type B” procedures (eg, biopsy) that may pose a risk to the patient. It is too early to draw any conclusion on the impact of this approach on donation decisions, but answers to arguments about the clarity of consent may be found here in due course.…”
Section: Intended Audience and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or a patient may wish to donate, but not if it required a significant delay in withdrawing life sustaining treatment, or involved pre-mortem interventions that carried particular risks. Weiss et al found that the majority of authors in their scoping review did not view a previously expressed willingness to donate as including consent for pre-mortem interventions, 12 although a qualitative interview study found that some NHS staff thought differently. [10] Either way, further evidence of wishes with regard to these aspects would be valuable.…”
Section: Ethical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%