Ethical Considerations of Applying Robots in Kindergarten Settings: Towards an Approach from a Macroperspective

Abstract

In child-robot interaction (cHRI) research, many studies pursue the goal to develop interactive systems that can be applied in everyday settings. For early education, increasingly, the setting of a kindergarten is targeted. However, when cHRI and research are brought into a kindergarten, a range of ethical and related procedural aspects have to be considered and dealt with. While ethical models elaborated within other human-robot interaction settings, e.g., assisted living contexts, can provide some important indicators for relevant issues, we argue that it is important to start developing a systematic approach to identify and tackle those ethical issues which rise with cHRI in kindergarten settings on a more global level and address the impact of the technology from a macroperspective beyond the effects on the individual. Based on our experience in conducting studies with children in general and pedagogical considerations on the role of the institution of kindergarten in specific, in this paper, we enfold some relevant aspects that have barely been addressed in an explicit way in current cHRI research. Four areas are analyzed and key ethical issues are identified in each area: (1) the institutional setting of a kindergarten, (2) children as a vulnerable group, (3) the caregivers' role, and (4) pedagogical concepts. With our considerations, we aim at (i) broadening the methodology of the current studies within the area of cHRI, (ii) revalidate it based on our comprehensive empirical experience with research in kindergarten settings, both laboratory and real-world contexts, and (iii) provide a framework for the development of a more systematic approach to address the ethical issues in cHRI research within kindergarten settings.

Do Shy Preschoolers Interact Differently When Learning Language With a Social Robot? An Analysis of Interactional Behavior and Word Learning

“…Based on previous work and ethical considerations (Vogt et al, 2019;Tolksdorf et al, 2020a;Tolksdorf and Mertens, 2020), we conducted a warm-up phase with each child and her or his parent before the learning situation with the robot. This introduced the robot to the children in a comfortable way with their caregiver as an available resource (Manner et al, 2018;Tolksdorf et al, 2020a) and reduced the novelty effect (Kanero et al, 2018). During the warm-up, the experimenter first introduced the robot in a powered-off state to the child and parent and explained its functions.…”

Continuity in Education in The Implementation of The STEM Education for The Children of Preschool and Elementary School Age Modular Program

“…The names of the modules reflect the above-mentioned unique characteristic of the program, namely, continuity, while maintaining the full possibility of mastering the educational module even without the previous stage. In this educational module, this opportunity is mainly provided by two lines of robotics designers with different complexity levels (both in terms of assembly and in terms of programming), which allow building individual paths for achieving the educational goals of the module: the stage-by-stage progress from simple to complex tasks, or from complex tasks to the tasks of increased complexity [19].…”

Pre-service teachers’ concerns about social robots in the classroom: A model for development

“…d) Sense of psychological imprisonment: A robot can permanently note children's behaviors, feelings and relationships, which can cause children to feel a sense of psychological imprisonment with the consequence of having their feelings regulated within this situation (Serholt et al, 2017). e) Trust: Children's trust in their educators might be impacted if CRI is not aligned with curricular activities (Tolksdorf, Siebert, Zorn, Horwath, & Rohlfing, 2020).…”