2019
DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2019.1683012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical decision-making interrupted: Can cognitive tools improve decision-making following an interruption?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when subordinates are aware that they are higher in SPS, they can engage in counteractive activities if they are matched with a transactional leader. For example, they may wish to employ a cognitive tool (Stenmark et al. , 2019) or engage in intentional deliberation when faced with an ethical problem (Stenmark and Redfearn, 2022), in order to help them overcome any detriments that they may face due to their mismatch with their leader.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when subordinates are aware that they are higher in SPS, they can engage in counteractive activities if they are matched with a transactional leader. For example, they may wish to employ a cognitive tool (Stenmark et al. , 2019) or engage in intentional deliberation when faced with an ethical problem (Stenmark and Redfearn, 2022), in order to help them overcome any detriments that they may face due to their mismatch with their leader.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corporate environment is always changing, and in the virtual workspace, employees are frequently working in new environments where conventions have yet to be formed and prototypes are limited. Therefore, employees frequently count on their higher-order cognitive skills (Stenmark et al, 2020 ), and, as any skilled tradesman, they require the tricks of the trade to do so effectively (Stenmark et al, 2019 ). The more an organisation can equip employees with moral norms to apply in diverse circumstances (as well as opportunities to apply them), the more likely they will utilise them to effectively solve their issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%