Ethical Dilemmas and Principles in Organ Transplantation in China

Zhang, Zhen; Zang, Zheng

doi:10.4067/s1726-569x2021000200181

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Establecer un procedimiento de consentimiento presunto permite que los órganos cadavéricos vuelvan a funcionar para alargar la existencia de más pacientes y suministrarían la creación de un Banco de Órganos, restableciendo la oferta y demanda de órganos (Zhang & Zang, 2021). Sin embargo a pesar de toda lo actuado siempre la medicina tiene un límite por el cual se debe determinar la mejor solución a finde que un paciente no esté en condiciones de sufrimiento (Marin, 2018), y así sus órganos puedan cumplir con salvar la vida de otra persona (Bermúdez, 2019), brindándole calidad de vida (Acero, 2020), también en Latinoamérica Colombia, (Bermúdez, 2019;Carreño et al, 2016;Chaparro, 2017;Varsi, 2019) Chile, Argentina aceptan el consentimiento presunto de donante cadavérico.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

El consentimiento tácito del donante cadavérico en salvaguarda del Derecho a la Salud Pública: Una mirada desde el estado del arte

Vásquez Flores,

Ludeña González,

Cueva Quezada

2023

rcli

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo fue analizar la regulación jurídica del consentimiento tácito de donante cadavérico y asegure el derecho a la salud mediante el estado del arte. Es de tipo básico y de enfoque cualitativo, se realizó un análisis documental, mediante una revisión bibliográfica, la búsqueda de información se obtuvo de publicaciones indexadas en Latinoamérica y Europa en las bases de datos de Ebsco, Scopus, Scielo, Redalyc y Dialnet, durante el período 2016 al 2023. Poca implementación de políticas públicas que ayuden a privilegiar el consentimiento presunto de donante cadavérico en salvaguarda de la salud pública. Conclusión, el consentimiento presunto de donante cadavérico contrarresta la alta demanda de órganos y la responsabilidad del Estado en el derecho de la salud pública, además, aún existe oposición por parte de sus familias, a pesar del consentimiento tácito del donante a fin de brindar una calidad de vida al receptor de la donación.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…El tercer artículo mostrado por Zhang & Zang (2021) Atañe a una investigación original realizada en China. El método es un análisis cualitativo.…”

Section: 6525unclassified

El consentimiento tácito del donante cadavérico en salvaguarda del Derecho a la Salud Pública: Una mirada desde el estado del arte

Vásquez Flores,

Ludeña González,

Cueva Quezada

2023

rcli

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…7 Other countries with greater restrictions on donation, such as Japan and South Korea, require authorization from both the individual during their lifetime and from family members after death. 8 From a bioethical standpoint, many scholars advocate that a donation should only be considered valid if it was the explicit wish of the deceased individual, rather than relying solely on the family's decision. However, others argue that offering the possibility of donation to the family can provide a way to relieve their suffering by adding a noble act to the tragedy of losing a loved one.…”

Section: Informed Consentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9,10 Therefore, the implementation of mandatory choice did not sufficiently increase the "donors" rate, where it was used, to justify the moral, social, and financial costs. 8 Education and public awareness are more important than a mandatory choice system.…”

Section: Mandatory Choicementioning

confidence: 99%

Organ donation consent after death

Garcia,

Pestana,

Pêgo-Fernandes

2024

Sao Paulo Med. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most countries where organ transplants are performed, defined laws exist to address different legal aspects of these procedures, particularly concerning consent for organ donation after death. 1 The authorization for organ removal for transplantation purposes raises controversial debates, considering its profound ethical and moral implications. It examines core societal values and reflects on fundamental rights, such as respect for human dignity, including the right to personality and autonomy of self-determination.Every individual possesses the freedom to decide regarding certain actions concerning their body according to their own conscience. However, these decisions must be made within certain boundaries to uphold fundamental rights. In Brazil, an individual's autonomy over their own body is included in three articles of the Constitution. Article 1 emphasizes the principle of human dignity; Article 5 outlines the right to life and the right to freedom; and Article 199 addresses the ability to waive parts of the human body. 2 Classification of consent for organ donation after deathConsent for organ donation is typically classified into four categories: informed consent, mandatory choice, presumed consent, and compulsory removal. Informed consent, mandatory choice, and presumed consent are used in a vast majority of countries, although with variations. 3,4 However, compulsory removal, which involves the mandatory removal of viable organs for transplantation from deceased individuals, is not legally permissible in any country.

show abstract

“…According to this ethical framework, the righteousness or legitimacy of an action is contingent upon whether it yields the greatest good (7). Utilitarianism contends that morally correct behavior is that which produces the maximum good or the least harm among all possible behaviors (8). In essence, the overall outcome of an action determines its moral legitimacy.…”

Section: Evaluate From Utilitarianismmentioning

confidence: 99%