2013
DOI: 10.1093/phe/pht014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Dilemmas in Population-Level Treatment of Lead Poisoning in Zamfara State, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, early involvement of ethical boards presents an opportunity for overcoming potential uncertainties on how to invite vulnerable individuals to serve as participants in health research in ASM contexts with all the required special justification [100,104]. The integration and support from multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary stakeholders, including collaboration with governmental and non-governmental organisations, indigenous populations, local leaders, and potential participants is a common practice and proven useful [49,[105][106][107]. The value added of such multi-stakeholder engagement enhances trust between partici-pants and scientists when conducting research involving vulnerable groups [100,101,105].…”
Section: Inclusion Of Vulnerable Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, early involvement of ethical boards presents an opportunity for overcoming potential uncertainties on how to invite vulnerable individuals to serve as participants in health research in ASM contexts with all the required special justification [100,104]. The integration and support from multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary stakeholders, including collaboration with governmental and non-governmental organisations, indigenous populations, local leaders, and potential participants is a common practice and proven useful [49,[105][106][107]. The value added of such multi-stakeholder engagement enhances trust between partici-pants and scientists when conducting research involving vulnerable groups [100,101,105].…”
Section: Inclusion Of Vulnerable Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration and support from multi-sectoral and multidisciplinary stakeholders, including collaboration with governmental and non-governmental organisations, indigenous populations, local leaders, and potential participants is a common practice and proven useful [49,[105][106][107]. The value added of such multi-stakeholder engagement enhances trust between partici-pants and scientists when conducting research involving vulnerable groups [100,101,105]. Independent of the context and chosen approach, it is critical to give the community s voices and decisions equal importance in addressing issues related to limited health data on vulnerable groups [49,106].…”
Section: Inclusion Of Vulnerable Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%