THIS ARTICLE ADDRESSES a values conflict forced upon immigrants and their social workers by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. Welfare reform has threatened hundreds of thousands of legal immigrants with loss of eligibility for federally funded benefits, unless they become naturalized American citizens (Keigher, 1997). Immigrant clients, who have myriad psychosocial problems, now have to address conflicts involving citizenship choices. Although these clients constitute a growing population in social work practice, little is known about their conflicts. Social work research in this area is seriously lacking.Should legal immigrants be forced to become American citizens in order to receive federal benefits, even when this may cause family strife and psychosocial distress? The punitive restrictions of PRWORA have pressured social workers to help their clients find solutions to this dilemma. Social workers have become invested in providing and referring (or both) clients to citizenship classes, and in tutoring eligible clients for the United States citizenship test (Keigher, 1997). Should social workers, in light of the restrictions of welfare reform, still uphold an immigrant's self-determination not to become a citizen? What values might guide social workers' ethical decision-making on this subject?
Social Work ValuesThe importance of values in social work is indisputable, for values represent a fundamental working element in social work practice and ethics (Bartlett, 1958;Gordon, 1965;Linzer, 1999;Loewenberg & Dolgoff, 1992). Social work values embody social workers' preferred views of people, what they prefer for people, and how they work with people (Levy, 1973). Values guide social work practice, and, ultimately, express social workers' commitments to action. Levy (1973) contends that social workers ought to share common conceptions of people. Among these conceptions are the inherent goodness of clients, their dignity, and their capacity for change (Linzer, 1999). Social workers' preferred conceptions lead them to prefer certain outcomes for their clients, including self-actualization, attainment of social relationships, and fulfillment of basic needs (National Association of Social Workers, 1996). In order to achieve certain outcomes, social workers use preferred instrumentalities (Levy, 1973), such as confidentiality, empathy, and support (NASW, 1996).Social workers, based on the preferred conception that immigrant clients may need public assistance, and in the face of welfare reform, have helped their clients to become