Ethical dilemmas: who can decide when euthanasia is justified?

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the ethical dilemma of euthanasia, considering the views of the veterinary nurse, the owner and the animal. The article will include criminal and civil consequences and will explain basic ethical theories with the aim of answering the question of who can decide when euthanasia should be carried out.

Euthanasia and Pain in Canine Patients with Terminal and Chronic-Degenerative Diseases: Ethical and Legal Aspects

“…An ethical perspective considers the different beliefs and values each individual assigns, resulting in multiple ways to approach the same subject [ 25 ], and simultaneously evaluates moral issues and the reasoning behind their views [ 26 ]. When considering euthanasia processes in companion animals, ethics contemplates notions such as when it is “right” or “wrong” to suggest the option to the owner according to the current state of the animal [ 7 , 27 ].…”

“…When considering euthanasia processes in companion animals, ethics contemplates notions such as when it is “right” or “wrong” to suggest the option to the owner according to the current state of the animal [ 7 , 27 ]. A clear example is end-of-life decision-making when treatment is no longer effective [ 25 ]. In this sense, the ethical basis would be to consider that all medical and financial alternatives have been used in the sick animal since client income is a strong predictor of euthanasia when guardians with financial constraints are less able to afford further treatment [ 28 ].…”

Cultural challenges surrounding euthanasia in Hong Kong: an RVN’s perspective

“…The veterinary nurse is obliged, both by the Code of Professional Conduct and by moral obligation, to provide the highest level of care to patients (Crump, 2013). However, the owner's legal rights, conferred by UK law, may conflict with the requirements of the Protection of Animals Act 1911, giving rise to a situation where the animal may suffer unnecessarily.…”