2008
DOI: 10.1080/10508420802066833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Issues in HIV/STD Prevention Research With High Risk Youth: Providing Help, Preserving Validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, any research involving youth raises distinct ethical issues; these include perceived power disparities, capacity to provide informed consent and legal obligations on the researcher to disclose otherwise confidential data (e.g., reports of physical or sexual abuse) ( 44 , 45 ). Parents, schools, and other authorities often act as gatekeepers, thus limiting researchers’ access to young people ( 44 46 ). Consequently, researchers may avoid studying young people in favor of other classes of participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, any research involving youth raises distinct ethical issues; these include perceived power disparities, capacity to provide informed consent and legal obligations on the researcher to disclose otherwise confidential data (e.g., reports of physical or sexual abuse) ( 44 , 45 ). Parents, schools, and other authorities often act as gatekeepers, thus limiting researchers’ access to young people ( 44 46 ). Consequently, researchers may avoid studying young people in favor of other classes of participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitators must have a written plan in place that guides their response to these issues, including what interventions facilitators can make independently, and who is on call to help with assessment, reporting or referral. PIRC has such a policy for emergency situations as well as a list of mental health and health experts available to help facilitators address emergency issues (Bauman, Sclafane, LoIacono, Wilson & Macklin, 2008). …”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescents who were not engaged in care and did not want to form a personal safety plan would have been referred to our on-call mental health professionals. A decision tree of the anticipated scenarios during participant screening — including rules for providing help to participants, contact information for experts to provide guidance and emergency procedures for dealing with life-threatening situations or adverse incidents (Bauman, Sclafane, LoIacono, Wilson, & Macklin, 2008; McDermott & Roen, 2012) — was devised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%