2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical issues in sport psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Is blissful ignorance permissible? (Watson et al, 2017). To conclude, the session discussions on the re-integration of diaphragmatic breathing (if this had not already occurred) were held.…”
Section: Intervention Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is blissful ignorance permissible? (Watson et al, 2017). To conclude, the session discussions on the re-integration of diaphragmatic breathing (if this had not already occurred) were held.…”
Section: Intervention Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…■ ■ Ethical practice requires practitioners to carefully consider how and where interview data will be collected, even though the sport environment often makes private conversations quite challenging and limited in both occurrence and duration. Yet, the challenges of the sport environment do not release practitioners from providing services that meet relevant ethical and professional standards (Watson, Way, & Hilliard, 2017).…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, clients may now own numerous electronic devices (personal computers, tablets, cellular/mobile telephones), that allow them to interact with SPPs in a variety of capacities (e.g., e-mail, phone call, video conferencing; cf. Hägglund et al, in press;Watson et al, 2017). In light of this, SPPs are challenged to respond to these new forms of communication while being mindful of the impact of these changes to their effectiveness and manage the expectations and needs of their clients as part of a continued development and evolution of their practice (Cottrell et al, 2019;Quartiroli et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%