Ethical Issues in the Music Industry Response to Innovation and Piracy

Abstract

The current conflict between the recording industry and a portion of its customers who are involved in illicit copying of music files arose from innovations involving the compression and electronic distribution of files over the internet. This paper briefly describes some of the challenges faced by the recording industry, and examines some of the ethical issues that arise in various industry and consumer responses to the opportunities and threats presented by these innovations. The paper concludes by highlighting the risks associated with responses that threaten further innovation, ultimately reducing the chances of finding solutions that hold appeal for all parties.

Ethics in Today’s Business World: Reflections from Business Scholars

“…Challenging the age old sentiment, ''two wrongs donÕt make a right'', this article also suggests that the perceived injustice of a current practice, in this case the electoral college system, influences whether efforts (i.e., vote swapping) designed to correct that system are viewed as ethical. This discussion resonates with work by Lee (2005) and Easley (2005), who, in addition to similarly identifying the ethical challenges associated with technological progress, also pinpoint unfair practices (i.e., monopoly held by music producers) as a motivational force that drives unethical actions by others (i.e., illegally copying software).…”

Illegal Downloading, Ethical Concern, and Illegal Behavior

“…The second assumption is that individuals who download would not steal a CD. Indeed, a number of researchers have argued that there is something inherently different about downloading and that downloaders perceive their behavior to be similar to recording a song from the radio, and do not liken it to stealing a CD from a store (Easley 2005). Hill (2007) also speculates that many people who commit digital piracy would not dream of stealing a CD from a store.…”

The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine

“…In this regard, the recording industry may not be the most reliable source of innovation or development of speech-facilitating technologies, particularly if they loosen its control on music distribution. In 2002, the recording industry settled a price-fixing lawsuit brought by 43 states, and agreed to pay over $140 million in cash and CDs as a part of the settlement (Easley, 2004). Currently, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer is investigating a possible illegal ''payola'' scheme in which the major recording labels may have used independent promoters to make undisclosed payments to radio stations to play selected songs of the major labels (Easley, 2004).…”

“…In 2002, the recording industry settled a price-fixing lawsuit brought by 43 states, and agreed to pay over $140 million in cash and CDs as a part of the settlement (Easley, 2004). Currently, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer is investigating a possible illegal ''payola'' scheme in which the major recording labels may have used independent promoters to make undisclosed payments to radio stations to play selected songs of the major labels (Easley, 2004). Although the investigation is still ongoing, already two major radio groups have announced ending their relationships with independent promoters (Heine, 2004).…”