2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of microdose clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not clear whether the kinetics of a microdose of a drug in vivo can predict the PK of a much larger therapeutic dose. However, there is mounting evidence that microdosing results are predictive of plasma PK and metabolism at the therapeutic dose level across a wide range of different chemical classes 4, 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear whether the kinetics of a microdose of a drug in vivo can predict the PK of a much larger therapeutic dose. However, there is mounting evidence that microdosing results are predictive of plasma PK and metabolism at the therapeutic dose level across a wide range of different chemical classes 4, 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, phase 0 approaches can lead to reduced use of animals in human drug development 138 . Of course, the potential for increased efficiency of drug development may mean increased health care benefits and increased ethical benefit-risk balance, topics discussed in greater detail elsewhere 33,138,[140][141][142][143] .…”
Section: Operational and Ethical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ethical benefits of the exploratory approaches are in the reduction of risk in human testing, the early identification and rejection of ineffective or toxic compounds, thereby avoiding delays in development of successful back‐up compounds, and preventing unnecessary testing in humans and animals. The ethics of administering drugs to humans with no therapeutic intent was brought up in earlier reports as a challenge to phase 0 studies . However, such testing, no different from usual phase I testing in healthy volunteers where also there is no therapeutic intent, is justified by the scientific necessity and beneficence implied in a more efficient drug development process.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethics of administering drugs to humans with no therapeutic intent was brought up in earlier reports as a challenge to phase 0 studies. [91][92][93] However, such testing, no different from usual phase I testing in healthy volunteers where also there is no therapeutic intent, is justified by the scientific necessity and beneficence implied in a more efficient drug development process. Phase 0 approaches are also consistent with the 3Rs, reduction, refinement, and replacement, promoting ethical animal research.…”
Section: Ethics -Risk/benefit Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%