2017
DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2017.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical professional-personal model of making decisions in forensic medicine

Abstract: In this paper, the authors want to introduce the concept of responsibility of an alive person to the values and rights of the deceased person through the ethical professional-personal model introduced, which will help us to make a decision when it comes to issues of morality and ethics in the forensic practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cannabis is the most commonly misused substance in DFSA cases [22,23], yet in the presented scenarios, neither the respiratory nor the oral administration were invoked; the colour, odor and water insolubility reduce the adminitration posibility chosen by the aggressor [24][25][26]. Amphetamines and cocaine are not obvious candidates for DFSA due to stimulant properties [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannabis is the most commonly misused substance in DFSA cases [22,23], yet in the presented scenarios, neither the respiratory nor the oral administration were invoked; the colour, odor and water insolubility reduce the adminitration posibility chosen by the aggressor [24][25][26]. Amphetamines and cocaine are not obvious candidates for DFSA due to stimulant properties [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this complex therapy it is necessary a staging of the treatment phases, which will take place over more or less long periods, depending on the severity of the clinical case, for complete recovery surgical therapy is sometimes inevitable. In the same time, the necessity of a good and complete recovery can avoid the forensic aspects claims (Radu et al, 2016;Radu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going after forensic outcomes that reduce the rate of cadaveric organ donations due to a long period of organ non-perfusion and cutting open organs for forensic examinations, the beneficence of the whole process should be judged on a caseto-case basis. 20 As discussed earlier, cadaveric organ donations are richly benefitting to several patients on the organ transplants waiting lists, particularly in Malaysia where the number of people who have pledged to donate organs still needs to improve further. In balancing the benefits of forensic outcomes such as described in item 2.1 above, each case is unique and has a solution that fits all might be tricky.…”
Section: Beneficencementioning
confidence: 99%