Ethical remediation practices addressing values conflicts: A delphi study

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to create concrete, practical recommendations for remediation with students struggling to effectively counsel members of the LGBTQ+ populations as a result of faith‐based values conflicts that are both effective and ethical. A panel of seven experts in counselor education participated in this Delphi study.

Counselor educators’ gatekeeping experiences during dissertation

“…All participants referenced how using informal gatekeeping interventions (e.g., conversations) more often than formal gatekeeping interventions (e.g., academic suspension) allowed them to correct most doctoral student behaviors during the dissertation. This finding is congruent with prior researchers that counselor educators prefer to address students’ poor performance through targeted interventions and support rather than using more drastic measures (Salpietro et al., 2021; Taylor Rouse & Doughty Horn, 2022). Participants in this study believed targeted interventions were immediate, effective, and could more quickly resolve doctoral student issues during the dissertation.…”

“…Informal (e.g., conversations between students and faculty without documentation) and formal (e.g., annual student evaluations) remediation efforts can vary and depend on program and student contexts. However, when educators or supervisors fail to implement gatekeeping and remediation interventions, gateslipping (i.e., students going unnoticed by instructors) may occur (Taylor Rouse & Doughty Horn, 2022).…”