2012
DOI: 10.4414/smw.2012.13610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical research on the implementation of DRGs in Switzerland - a challenging project

Abstract: Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) are currently being introduced on a national scale as a prospective reimbursement scheme in Swiss in-patient hospital care, replacing any remaining retrospective day-rate arrangements. DRGs are expected to promote transparency and efficiency while helping to contain health care costs. The governmental decision to introduce DRGs has caused considerable controversy among different stakeholders, due to diverging appraisals of what will happen when DRGs are introduced as an economic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even accounting for hospitals withdrawing from or losing the BFH certification, the overall number of BFHs increased up to 2005 (Forrester-Knauss, Merten, Weiss, Ackermann-Liebrich, & Stutz, 2013). Thereafter, BFHs decreased slightly and then markedly from 2012 onwards, when a hospital financing system based on Diagnosis Related Groups was introduced in Switzerland (Wild, Pfister, & Biller-Andorno, 2012). Budgetary pressures accompanied the new financing system, and a conflict arose between financial objectives and time spent monitoring Baby-Friendly (BF) practices and offering educational and emotional support to mothers (Conzelmann-Auer, 2009;Furrer, Schwab, & Oetterli, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even accounting for hospitals withdrawing from or losing the BFH certification, the overall number of BFHs increased up to 2005 (Forrester-Knauss, Merten, Weiss, Ackermann-Liebrich, & Stutz, 2013). Thereafter, BFHs decreased slightly and then markedly from 2012 onwards, when a hospital financing system based on Diagnosis Related Groups was introduced in Switzerland (Wild, Pfister, & Biller-Andorno, 2012). Budgetary pressures accompanied the new financing system, and a conflict arose between financial objectives and time spent monitoring Baby-Friendly (BF) practices and offering educational and emotional support to mothers (Conzelmann-Auer, 2009;Furrer, Schwab, & Oetterli, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported a reduction of LOS at hospital after the implementation of DRG-based financing [5][6][7], but some controversies occurred regarding potential damaging effects on the quality of care of patients or on the professionals' autonomy and satisfaction. A recent publication provided a framework on some ethical concerns of DRG implementation defined at different levels and themes that were interdependant: (1) macro-level (viability of the health system, quality of the health care system, development of actors and political organizations), (2) meso-level (hospital organization, complex management) and 3micro-level (interaction between patient and care givers in the systemic context) [8].…”
Section: Rationale Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these logistics issues, in the USA cEEG is related to higher hospitalisation charges compared with rEEG [6,8,9]; that hospital reimbursement system nevertheless differs from those of other settings, since different professional fees are applied to EEG procedures. Several European countries including Switzerland [10,11], Australia, Canada and Japan [12] use diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), whose purpose is to classify patients according to demographics, principal and secondary diagnoses, comorbidities and complications; procedures performed play a relatively minor role. Based on this information, patients will belong to a certain DRG [13] associated with a specific reimbursement estimated on similar cases [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%