2006
DOI: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Theory as Social Practice

Abstract: This article represents a search for a different analytical language through which anthropology can engage with human rights. This effort is intended to contribute to what is an expanding range of ways in which anthropologists conceptualize, advocate for, and critique contemporary human rights. Its central argument is that current ethnographic studies of human rights practices can be used as the basis for making innovative claims within human rights debates that take place outside of anthropology itself. To do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A brief recapitulation of this argument, as rehearsed by Mark Goodale (2006), goes like this: since U.S. anthropology came to be synonymous with so-called cultural relativism, and since cultural relativism was typically equated with the categorical rejection of all universalizing normative frameworks (e.g., 'universal human rights'), ethics never evolved into a specific topic of consideration. A brief recapitulation of this argument, as rehearsed by Mark Goodale (2006), goes like this: since U.S. anthropology came to be synonymous with so-called cultural relativism, and since cultural relativism was typically equated with the categorical rejection of all universalizing normative frameworks (e.g., 'universal human rights'), ethics never evolved into a specific topic of consideration.…”
Section: An Anthropology Of Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief recapitulation of this argument, as rehearsed by Mark Goodale (2006), goes like this: since U.S. anthropology came to be synonymous with so-called cultural relativism, and since cultural relativism was typically equated with the categorical rejection of all universalizing normative frameworks (e.g., 'universal human rights'), ethics never evolved into a specific topic of consideration. A brief recapitulation of this argument, as rehearsed by Mark Goodale (2006), goes like this: since U.S. anthropology came to be synonymous with so-called cultural relativism, and since cultural relativism was typically equated with the categorical rejection of all universalizing normative frameworks (e.g., 'universal human rights'), ethics never evolved into a specific topic of consideration.…”
Section: An Anthropology Of Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, no widespread usage has been made of this anthropological research within the framework of lively debates on human rights taking place outside of this discipline (Goodale 2006b). …”
Section: Anthropological Perspectives On Human Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or is it simply a catchy slogan or bumper sticker? From a medical anthropological perspective, how might we make sense of these “different registers” (Goodale 2006) of right to health discourse and the divergent ways in which this right becomes “transformed, deformed, appropriated, and resisted” (Wilson 2001)?…”
Section: The Right To Health: Foundations and Contestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%