Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study

Abstract

Values such as respect for autonomy, safety, enablement, independence, privacy and social connectedness should be reflected in the design of social robots. The same values should affect the process by which robots are introduced into the homes of older people to support independent living. These values may, however, be in tension. We explored what potential users thought about these values, and how the tensions between them could be resolved. With the help of partners in the ACCOMPANY project, 21 focus groups (123 participants) were convened in France, the Netherlands and the UK. These groups consisted of: (i) older people, (ii) informal carers and (iii) formal carers of older people. The participants were asked to discuss scenarios in which there is a conflict between older people and others over how a robot should be used, these conflicts reflecting tensions between values. Participants favoured compromise, persuasion and negotiation as a means of reaching agreement. Roles and related rolenorms for the robot were thought relevant to resolving tensions, as were hypothetical agreements between users and robot-providers before the robot is introduced into the home. Participants' understanding of each of the valuesautonomy, safety, enablement, independence, privacy and social connectedness-is reported. Participants tended to agree that autonomy often has priority over the other values, with the exception in certain cases of safety. The second part of the paper discusses how the values could be incorporated into the design of social robots and operationalised in line with the views expressed by the participants.

A robotic shower system

“…These arguments have an underlying additional ethical theme: choice. The possibility to choose is strongly related to autonomy [ 8 ]. Often choosing out of a range of options is one of the last parts of autonomy when experiencing functional loss.…”

Artificial Intelligence for Good Health: A Scoping Review of the Ethics Literature

“…However, those leading the discussion on the ethics of AI in health seldom mentioned engagement with the end users and bene ciaries whose voices they were representing. While much attention was given to the impacts of AI health applications on underserved populations, only a handful of records actually included primary accounts from the people for whom they were raising concerns (2,59,89,(114)(115)(116)). Yet without better understanding the perspectives of end users, we risk con ning the ethics discourse to the hypothetical, devoid of the realities of everyday life.…”

Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications in Health, Assistance, and Entertainment

“…They argued that designs need to be more obvious for the people that will be using or interacting with the robot. Other projects [13,2] have seen this need for respecting the privacy of an elderly person at home.…”