Ethics and governance of global health inequalities

Abstract

Background: A world divided by health inequalities poses ethical challenges for global health. International and national responses to health disparities must be rooted in ethical values about health and its distribution; this is because ethical claims have the power to motivate, delineate principles, duties and responsibilities, and hold global and national actors morally responsible for achieving common goals. Theories of justice are necessary to define duties and obligations of institutions and actors in reducing inequalities. The problem is the lack of a moral framework for solving problems of global health justice. Aim: To study why global health inequalities are morally troubling, why efforts to reduce them are morally justified, how they should be measured and evaluated; how much priority disadvantaged groups should receive; and to delineate roles and responsibilities of national and international actors and institutions. Discussion and conclusions: Duties and obligations of international and state actors in reducing global health inequalities are outlined. The ethical principles endorsed include the intrinsic value of health to well-being and equal respect for all human life, the importance of health for individual and collective agency, the concept of a shortfall from the health status of a reference group, and the need for a disproportionate effort to help disadvantaged groups. This approach does not seek to find ways in which global and national actors address global health inequalities by virtue of their self-interest, national interest, collective security or humanitarian assistance. It endorses the more robust concept of ''human flourishing'' and the desire to live in a world where all people have the capability to be healthy. Unlike cosmopolitan theory, this approach places the role of the nation-state in the forefront with primary, though not sole, moral responsibility. Rather shared health governance is essential for delivering health equity on a global scale.

Lifestyle Vaccines and Public Health: Exploring Policy Options for a Vaccine to Stop Smoking

“…This different emphasis is in line with pressing calls to address health inequities (Buchanan, 2000;Marmot, 2006;Powers and Faden, 2006;Ruger, 2006;Wolff and DeShalit, 2007). What position could NV have in policies that aim first and foremost at reducing the gap between smoking and health?…”

Can a single indicator measure both attainment and shortfall inequality?

“…I have exploited these results in the derivation of the two indices. But there may be situations in which the bounds differ between (groups of) individuals, say between women and men (see Ruger, 2006: 1000, for a general discussion of this issue). If that is the case, the derivations are no longer valid, and it seems difficult to arrive at a neat result.…”

Foreign policy matters: a normative view of the G8 and population health

“…An alternative view is gaining prominence: "Global actors and institutions, whether they act bilaterally (especially direct overseas development assistance, trade agreements) or multilaterally (through, e.g., the United Nations system, World Bank or International Monetary Fund), are obligated to remedy global inequalities that exist in affluence, power, and social, economic and political opportunities". 9 As applied to the G8, at least five arguments for this view can be identified.…”