with clinical assistance of FRAN~r DYCK** MANY psychological factors affect the patient who requires an anaesthetic and an operation. To varying degrees these may influence the response to a curative or palhatlve operation, either to' advantage or to disadvantage (I 1). These factors are of such an intangible nature that the wisest clinician has difficulty when he attempts to measure them either subjectively or objectively (2). The determination of the effect of drugs upon psychological changes induced by a stress situation in a hospital environment multaphes the complexity of the mehsurements (3).It is exceedingly difficult for the elimcal inveshgator to eliminate prejudice and bias, and it is even more difficult to formulate reliable and vahd objective and subjechve means fo" determining the value of procedures designed to influence favourably the psychological and physiological ~esponse of a patient to operation (4, 5). A few investigators have recently tackled "this problem in a way which is unique in clinical medicine (6,7, 8,9,10). They used combinations of sedative-hypnotic drugs and placebos in double blind studies. The results, of such studies have provided us with lughly revealing information. Herring (11) has studied this problem on a a even wider base. Iu evaluating the effects of premedlcant drugs he has referred to the psychological factors as "predictor'" variables and to the factors representing the surgical response as "criterion'" variables He divided the predictor variables into two categories: first, those measuring personality varlable,~ which may be elicited from patients prior to an operation, and second, the judgments made by psychologists using these measurements m an effort to predict responses during the operation. The criterion variables are also dwlded into two categories: first; the physiological response related to the operation (as determlned by blood pressure, heart rate, tadal volume), the second, the judgments made on the basis of these factors by climelans as to the patient's over-all stablhty. The predictor variables were categorized under nine different workin~ variables, namely, anxiety or fear, lack of asserBveness, depression, insta91hty or maladjustment, intellectual rigidity, high intelhgence, introversion, primitive thinking and idiosyncratic stress reaction. It was stated that for patients showing any of the first elgl~at factors unfavourable reactions on the physiological record (!kept by the anaesthetist) would be presumed. Even with strict selectwe contro'l as to the age, the sex, a normal cardiovascular system, tflae anaesthetic technique, and the operative procedures in a group of 25 patients, Herring found the problem of predicting