2002
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and Public Health: Forging a Strong Relationship

Abstract: The field of bioethics arose in the late 1960s in response to the emerging ethical dilemmas of that era. The field for many years focused in general on the dilemmas generated by high-technology medicine rather than on issues of population health and the ethical problems of public health programs and regulations. The time has come to more fully integrate the ethical problems of public health into the field of public health and, at the same time, into the field of bioethics. Public health raises a number of mora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
0
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
175
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, other scholars like Mariner (2009), Magnusson (2007), and Burris, Kawachi and Sarat (2002) argue among others that public health laws should focus on determining or serving as a mechanism for the health effects of social and physical environments. Callahan and Jennings (2002) have also argued toward this end that as the concern of health policymakers turn toward health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and preventive measures throughout the life cycle (primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention), the field of public health is gaining increased public and legislative attention. They further argue among other things that Public health, especially the public health professional in many matters has the legal power especially the police power of the state behind it.…”
Section: International and Multidisciplinary Journal Of Social Sciencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, other scholars like Mariner (2009), Magnusson (2007), and Burris, Kawachi and Sarat (2002) argue among others that public health laws should focus on determining or serving as a mechanism for the health effects of social and physical environments. Callahan and Jennings (2002) have also argued toward this end that as the concern of health policymakers turn toward health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and preventive measures throughout the life cycle (primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention), the field of public health is gaining increased public and legislative attention. They further argue among other things that Public health, especially the public health professional in many matters has the legal power especially the police power of the state behind it.…”
Section: International and Multidisciplinary Journal Of Social Sciencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They advocate a more holistic, social justice approach in bioethics, which has been referred to as "population-based bioethics" or "integrative bioethics" (Sodeke 2012 ). It can be argued that this expansion of bioethics beyond clinical ethics into population issues moves bioethics into the arena of public health ethics (Callahan and Jennings 2002 ).…”
Section: Research Ethics Clinical Ethics and Bioethics : Principlimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to keep its promise of improving health, nutrigenomics needs to see its scientific progress harmonized with human dignity and social justice as expressed through adherence to fundamental ethical principles. Some of the ethical issues raised by nutrigenomics will be the same as those raised by the development of genomics research and applications in general: notably, genetic exceptionalism and reductionism [72][73][74] Such questions underline the importance of not loosing sight of the ethical principles at the root of global health ethics [75][76][77]. Because of the power imparted to public health authorities, the ethical integration of nutrigenomics into global health requires the informed awareness of lay citizens, and eventually their participation in the formulation of public policy in a framework of respect for local and cultural particularities [64].…”
Section: The Major Ethical Challenges Of Nutrigenomics For Global Heamentioning
confidence: 99%