1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(96)00146-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and Social Responsibility in Marketing: An Examination of the Ethical Evaluation of Advertising Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…But there are several companies which are continuous engaged in advertising such product or services which are causing economic, physical, or psychological harm (McDaniel et al, [11]; Hill,[12]; Wallendorf, [13]; Nwachukwu et al, [14]). …”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there are several companies which are continuous engaged in advertising such product or services which are causing economic, physical, or psychological harm (McDaniel et al, [11]; Hill,[12]; Wallendorf, [13]; Nwachukwu et al, [14]). …”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, ads target at those with low sovereignty are perceived as less ethical than ads aiming at consumers perceived to have high sovereignty. Finally, ads for harmful products are perceived to be less ethical than ads for nonharmful products (Nwachukwu et al 1997 ).…”
Section: Advertisement Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies that declined participation in the study were replaced by similar, randomly chosen companies performing the same economic activities and in the same geographical area. Non-response bias was analyzed (Nwachukwu, Vitell, Gilbert, & Barnes, 1997). Response effectiveness during the first round of interviews represented 80% of the sample; these results were compared with those of respondents included by replacement (20% of sample); according to t and chi-square tests, there were no significant differences between the groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%