Ethics, Emotions, and the Skills of Talking About Progressing Disease With Terminally Ill Adolescents

Abstract

IMPORTANCEFor clinicians caring for adolescent patients living with progressive, life-threatening illness, discussions regarding prognosis, goals of care, and treatment options can be extremely challenging. While clinicians should respect and help to facilitate adolescents' emerging autonomy, they often must also work with parents' wishes to protect patients from the emotional distress of hearing bad news.OBSERVATIONS We reviewed the ethical justifications for and against truth-telling, and we considered the published ethical and practice guidance, as well as the perspectives of patients, parents, and clinicians involved in these cases. We also explored particular challenges with respect to the cultural context, timing, and content of conversations at the end of adolescents' lives. In most cases, clinicians should gently but persistently engage adolescents directly in conversations about their disease prognosis and corresponding hopes, worries, and goals. These conversations need to occur multiple times, allowing significant time in each discussion for exploration of patient and family values. While truth-telling does not cause the types of harm that parents and clinicians may fear, discussing this kind of difficult news is almost always emotionally distressing. We suggest some "phrases that help" when clinicians strive to deepen understanding and facilitate difficult conversations with adolescents, parents, and other family members. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe pediatrician's opportunities to engage in difficult conversations about poor prognosis may be rare, but such conversations can be crucial. These discussions affect how patients live at the end of their lives, how they die, and how their families go on. Improved understanding of basic principles of communication, as well as augmented understanding of patient, family, and clinician perspectives may better enable us to navigate these important conversations.

Communication about prognosis and end‐of‐life in pediatric organ failure and transplantation

“…Not all pediatric patients desire communication about prognosis or end‐of‐life care, and some parents may request that these topics not be discussed even when a child asks for this information. However, it is important for providers and parents to remain aware that conversations of this nature may actually reduce a young person's worries and better equip parents to support and protect their child . Early engagement in ACP has also been found to be beneficial for young people.…”

Ethical issues in the care of adolescent and young adult oncology patients

“…As a result of these challenges, many physicians and patients/families maintain discordant understandings of prognosis . See Rosenberg et al for an in‐depth review of prognostic communication with terminally ill adolescents …”

Adolescent patient involvement in discussions about relapsed or refractory cancer with oncology clinicians

“…Clinicians in neither of these conversations asked the adolescent if he or she had questions or further assessed for the adolescent's understanding after the delivery of this information. Discussions of life‐threatening illness are challenging, and clinicians and parents who worry about causing a young patient undue distress therefore may hesitate to engage in such conversations in the presence of the adolescent . However, demonstrated benefits of these conversations include development of a trusting relationship between the clinician, adolescent, and family, opportunities for the adolescent to make thoughtful decisions about future care and other life plans, generation of hope and peace of mind through reduction of uncertainty, and further discussion of hopes, worries, and values, all of which may guide future care .…”