2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003247234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics for Evaluation

Abstract: Comparative Policy Evaluation Volume 27 Ethics for EvaluationBeyond "doing no harm" to "tackling bad" and "doing good" Edited by

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address these societal transformations, evaluators are encouraged to account for all the various facets of the situation. First, they should examine the distributional effects of the evaluated policy on different demographic groups and assess whether the policy promotes fairness and addresses social or economic disparities (van den Berg et al, 2022). Second, evaluators should adapt evaluation methods and approaches, often influenced by Western paradigms, to incorporate more inclusive, equitable and culturally diverse perspectives (Hood et al, 2015;Picciotto, 2019).…”
Section: Incorporating Societal Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these societal transformations, evaluators are encouraged to account for all the various facets of the situation. First, they should examine the distributional effects of the evaluated policy on different demographic groups and assess whether the policy promotes fairness and addresses social or economic disparities (van den Berg et al, 2022). Second, evaluators should adapt evaluation methods and approaches, often influenced by Western paradigms, to incorporate more inclusive, equitable and culturally diverse perspectives (Hood et al, 2015;Picciotto, 2019).…”
Section: Incorporating Societal Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%