Ethics in Emerging Technology

Dainow, Brandt

doi:10.1093/itnow/bwu067

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Once again he simply restates observations of the past. The same is true of Dainow (2014), who discusses the ethics of emerging technology. He concludes:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Future vision

Rogerson

2015

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper reviews the world of ICT from its early days to the near future. The aim is to consider how successfully academia, industry and government have worked together in delivering ethically acceptable ICT which is accessible to those who might benefit from such advances. The paper concludes with suggestions of a fresh approach for the future. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws upon evidence from the history of computers, funded research projects, professional bodies in the field, the ETHICOMP conference series and reported ICT disasters. The author uses his experience as both an ICT practitioner and an academic in the ICT ethics field to synthesise the evidence so providing a foundation on which to build an outline global action plan. Finding The paper lays out the findings that there has been much detailed observation and analysis of the ethical challenges surrounding ICT but the transformation of this into widespread practical positive action remains elusive. It explores why progress has been difficult. Originality/valueThis review of the interconnecting landscapes of practical ICT, funded research and the ICT ethics community is new. The attempt to demonstrate what progress has been made and to identify the underlying factors which influence progress are valuable to future generations working in this area. The concluding suggestions for action offer a starting point for entering the next phase of ICT ethics.

show abstract

“…Once again he simply restates observations of the past. The same is true of Dainow (2014), who discusses the ethics of emerging technology. He concludes:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Future vision

Rogerson

2015

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, it has been discussed whether wearable devices designed for certain forms of disability can reinforce a social stigma drawing extra attention to one's physical condition (Schukat et al, 2016). On the other hand, smartwatches and fitness trackers proved to be a positive exception in this respect: designed in the form of a regular and well-known accessory, they are easily accepted in many social circumstances, as opposed to less conventional forms (Dainow, 2014). Morozova and Gurova (2021a) argue that these wearables can help eliminate stigma attached to the ageing body by carrying out the measurements in an unnoticeable and non-intrusive way.…”

Section: Wearables and Social Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fashion and Technology: A Concern Over Wearables' Environmental and Social Implications

Morozova¹

2023

Pioneering New Perspectives in the Fashion Industry: Disruption, Diversity and Sustainable Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, AR glasses could identify a hamburger based on its typical appearance but, if it cannot detect whether this hamburger is made from chicken or beef, the retrieval of accurate nutritional information would be impossible. In terms of ethical issues, the ability of AR systems to record videos, take photos and even identify faces [ 59 ] “secretly” [ 60 ] poses a threat to the privacy of others [ 61 ]. In addition, the user’s own privacy may be jeopardized, as they could be monitored by unauthorized parties through the AR device [ 62 ].…”

Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends of Augmented Reality for Agri-Food Applications

Xie

Chai²,

O’Sullivan³

et al. 2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in deploying state-of-the-art augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) for agri-food applications. The benefits of AR HMDs to agri-food industry stakeholders (e.g., food suppliers, retail/food service) have received growing attention and recognition. AR HMDs enable users to make healthier dietary choices, experience novel changes in their perception of taste, enhance the cooking and food shopping experience, improve productivity at work and enhance the implementation of precision farming. Therefore, although development costs are still high, the case for integration of AR in food chains appears to be compelling. This review will present the most recent developments of AR HMDs for agri-food relevant applications. The summarized applications can be clustered into different themes: (1) dietary and food nutrition assessment; (2) food sensory science; (3) changing the eating environment; (4) retail food chain applications; (5) enhancing the cooking experience; (6) food-related training and learning; and (7) food production and precision farming. Limitations of current practices will be highlighted, along with some proposed applications.

show abstract

Ethics in Emerging Technology

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Future vision

Future vision

Fashion and Technology: A Concern Over Wearables' Environmental and Social Implications

Trends of Augmented Reality for Agri-Food Applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About