2002
DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2002.11424159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics in Legal Education and Training: Four Reports, Three Jurisdictions and a Prospectus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'liberal' focus of law degrees 141 leads to limited opportunities to educate for the realities of professional life, 142 despite the fact that non-legal careers are ruled out by only a small number of prospective lawyers. 143 They may be increasingly aware of demands for longer hours and weekend work 144 but not that legal work is often routine and mundane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'liberal' focus of law degrees 141 leads to limited opportunities to educate for the realities of professional life, 142 despite the fact that non-legal careers are ruled out by only a small number of prospective lawyers. 143 They may be increasingly aware of demands for longer hours and weekend work 144 but not that legal work is often routine and mundane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tijdens de opleiding dient de nadruk in het curriculum zich te verplaatsen van descriptie naar reflectie en een kritische houding (zie ook Boon, 2002: 34 e.v.) Bij een stapsgewijze opbouw in het curriculum moet het niveau in leerdoelen voor ethiek toenemen in complexiteit (Robertson, 2005: 237-239;Robertson, 2009: 63).…”
Section: Integratie In Het Curriculumunclassified
“…38 The ethics movement (such as it is) while potentially seeking to reinforce the traditional ideological and normative components of legal professionalism, has also sought to eschew a narrow vocational agenda, emphasising the need to inculcate wider 'humane values' 39 and to promote resistance to unethical practice cultures and sheer ethical indifference. 40 Similarly, socio-legal and interdisciplinary approaches, while traditionally seeking to counter the continuing dominance of legal formalism and doctrinalism, are also capable of co-option-à la mode 2-either to utilitarian definitions of 'context' in terms purely of the business or economic context of law, 41 or to the assimilation of a narrow, increasingly user-defined, policy orientation, 42 both of which may limit or even undermine the potential of the law schools as 'incubators of social criticism'. 43 The interesting question for us is, which of these existing tendencies may be exacerbated by the TFR?…”
Section: Commodificationmentioning
confidence: 99%