Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement

Abstract

This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.

Use of CT and artificial intelligence in suspected or COVID-19 positive patients: statement of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology

“…Few data are available about the role of artificial intelligence as a radiological decision support system in COVID-19 patients; it is too early to apply this technology in clinical practice as first-line modality. There are in fact many ethical and medico-legal implications in the use of this technology that, even in this emergency situation, do not allow its routine use [23][24][25]. As for any new technology, a clinical validation phase is needed with single or multicenter trials, and standardized approaches for imaging methodology and artificial intelligence algorithms.…”

Ethical principles for the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in nuclear medicine

“…In imaging, the learning around ethics in AI is occurring in parallel to innovation and implementation (6). There is a duty of care to deeply understand the technology, its benefits and its risks.…”

“…There is increased demand for not only richer data (welllabelled) but commercial access to it driven by the potential to significantly improve health and well-being (6). There is a trade-off then between this beneficence and potential maleficence through commercial exploitation of data or doing actual harm to patients or the "common good" (6). The foundation of capability for ANNs is large data sets for training and validation.…”

Seventy Years and Counting: The Canadian Association of Radiologists’ Journal

“…A widely quoted example is the position paper from international radiological organizations on the ethical implications of artificial intelligence in radiology. 12…”