“…Although some authors have taken a stand against conducting such research (Edwards, 2000), most writers have supported research with some limitations: appropriate consent of a surrogate (Freedman, 2001), a cost to people with ID if important research is not done (i.e., a palliative or curative intervention for a related health condition cannot be studied; Haywood, 1977). A famous editor of the New England Journal of Medicine has weighed in on research for children with and without ID (Ingelfinger, 1973), controversial researcher at Willowbrook has set forth arguments that support his hepatitis studies (Krugman, 1986), and others have argued in favor of general acceptance of important research (Weisstub & Arboleda-Florez, 1997;Weisstub, Arboleda-Florez, & Tomossy, 1996). Even though many authors support research in general, there are numerous other problems that have been mentioned: often difficult dilemmas arise (Baudouin, 1990), participation may conflict with emphasis on protecting the rights of the person with mental impairment (Clayton, 1972), and individual rights may come into conflict with the state government aims and rights (Davis & Mahon, 1984).…”