“…Accordingly, from a prudence-ethical point of view, the avoidance of systematic constraints, the avoidance of restrictions on actors and decision-making capabilities, as well as the preservation of revisability and compensability must become a central value in the design of socio-technical systems. If these process-oriented criteria remain a matter of subjective value assessments of discourse participants in multi-criteria decision analyses in TA there is a danger to the possibility of acting in accordance with a well-funded precautionary principle and thus jeopardize the conditions of the possibility of responsible action (Kornwachs 2000). A good example for such a problem is the development of the transport system in Germany: With regard to these higher-level values and criteria, there never should have been such a one-sided, coercive transport policy which is now hardly able to react to uprising problems like climate change, lack of urban space, noise pollution, etc.…”