This paper argues that interview location plays a role in constructing reality, serving simultaneously as both cultural product and producer. Thus, the choice of interview location (who chooses and what place is chosen)is not just a technical matter of convenience and comfort. It should be examined within the social context of the study being conducted and analyzed as an integral part of the interpretation of the findings. In the present case study, involving Palestinian female citizens of Israel, the decision of where to hold the interview allowed the participants to negotiate directly or symbolically with societal norms and to express their re/positioning in Israeli society and in their own community and to demand that the interviewers, particularly the Jewish ones, traverse both geographic and social boundaries. The interview not only structured the individual subjectivity of interviewer and participant but also broadened and deepened the concept of knowledge and its sources, and incorporated the subjects' experiential truths as part of a gendered, ethnonational social reality.KEY WORDS: in-depth interview; location; interview society; Palestinian women; social boundaries.Of the various components of the interview process, relatively little attention has been paid to where the interview takes place and who selects the interview location. This paper aims to fill in this deficiency by dealing with the choice of interview location. The argument presented here is threefold: (a) the issue of who selects the location, and what setting is chosen, is not only a technical matter of convenience and comfort but should be examined within the social context of the study being conducted; (b) the location selected should be seen as part of the interpretation of the findings; and lastly, (c) the interview location plays a role in constructing reality, serving simultaneously as both cultural product and producer.