Ethnic density and area deprivation: Neighbourhood effects on Māori health and racial discrimination in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Abstract

Some studies suggest that ethnic minority people are healthier when they live in areas with a higher concentration of people from their own ethnic group, a so-called ethnic density effect. To date, no studies have examined the ethnic density effect among indigenous peoples, for whom connections to land, patterns of settlement, and drivers of residential location may differ from ethnic minority populations.The present study analysed the Māori sample from the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey to examine the association between increased Māori ethnic density, area deprivation, health, and experiences of racial discrimination. Results of multilevel regressions showed that an increase in Māori ethnic density was associated with decreased odds of reporting poor self-rated health, doctor-diagnosed common mental disorders, and experienced racial discrimination. These associations were strengthened after adjusting for area deprivation, which was consistently associated with increased odds of reporting poor health and reports of racial discrimination. Our findings show that whereas ethnic density is protective of the health and exposure to racial discrimination of Māori, this effect is concealed by the detrimental effect of area deprivation, signalling that the benefits of ethnic density must be interpreted within the current socio-political context. This includes the institutional structures and racist practices that have created existing health and socioeconomic inequities in the first place, and maintain the unequal distribution of concentrated poverty in areas of high Māori density. Addressing poverty and the inequitable distribution of socioeconomic resources by ethnicity and place in New Zealand is vital to improving health and reducing inequalities. Given the racialised nature of access to goods, services, and opportunities within New Zealand society, this also requires a strong commitment to eliminating racism. Such commitment and action will allow the benefits potentially flowing from strong communities to be fully realised.

Neighbourhood characteristics and under-five mortality in Nigeria

“…Although a study by Gilbert et al (2013) established a decline in infant mortality across neighbourhood income quintiles over time in Canada, the study indicates the need for infant health promotion policies among the vulnerable populations. A study by Becares et al (2013) established association between area deprivation and poor health outcomes, and concludes that addressing neighbourhood poverty and area deprivation is essential to improving health outcomes of individuals.…”

Determining the spatial heterogeneity underlying racial and ethnic differences in timely mammography screening

“…Community connection’s effect in encouraging mammograms is localized to a mostly Black and Hispanic area. This could be a reflection of a phenomenon known as ‘ethnic density.’ Ethnic density a process identified in several countries wherein minorities residing in mostly minority communities, such as places racially segregated, gain protective health effects from the close connections and reduced discrimination enjoyed in these places [38, 60, 61]. Indeed, it would support Dean’s et al [14] theory that Black women are more likely to pursue mammograms in their local context based on the presence of local community connection.…”

Mood and anxiety disorders in Australia and New Zealand's indigenous populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…It may be that despite significant disadvantage, Indigenous culture actually forms a protective factor against psychiatric disorders: research has found that for Maori people, connection to culture is linked to greater resilience (Muriwai et al, 2015) and subjective well-being (Houkamau and Sibley, 2011). Further, research has found that living in areas of higher ethnic density is linked to better health outcomes, such as lower diagnosed psychiatric disorders and higher self-reported health in Maori people (despite deprivation in these regions; Bécares et al, 2013) and less psychological distress in Indigenous Australian people (Cunningham and Paradies, 2012). Interestingly, Bécares et al's study found that psychological distress was highest in areas of higher deprivation-these areas also happened to have higher Maori density, and lower rates of psychiatric disorders.…”