Whilst attention has previously focused on the importance of monolithic ethnic identities on migrant place-making less attention has been paid to how placemaking proceeds in super-diverse urban neighbourhoods where no single ethnic group predominates. This paper makes an original contribution by identifying the factors that shape migrants affinity with, or alienation from, super-diverse neighbourhoods.Through using and critiquing an analytical framework developed by Gill (2010) that identifies 'ideal' and 'pathological' place-making strategies, the paper contrasts two super-diverse neighbourhoods in the UK with different histories of diversity. We show how 'ideal' migrant place-making is more likely to occur where there is a common neighbourhood identity based around diversity, difference and / or newness, and where those with 'visible' differences can blend in. In contrast, 'pathologies' are more likely where the on-going churn of newcomers, coupled with the speed and recency of change, undermine migrant's affinity with place and where the diversity of the neighbourhoodis not yet embedded. Even where neighbourhood identity based on diversity is established, it may alienate less visible migrants and culminate in a new form of (minority) white flight.Keywords -Super-diversity; neighbourhood; migrant place-making 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 This paper contributes new knowledge about the ways in which migrant place-making proceeds in super-diverse areas. It highlights how multiple aspects of super-diversity and the visibility of individuals can be equally important as ethno-national identity in shaping attachment and affinity to the neighbourhood. In so doing, it moves beyond existing analyses of migrant place-making that focus on single ethnic groups.
IntroductionThe paper identifies experiences of place-making in two different areas: one with a long history of diversity and another more recently diversifying. It extends existing knowledge to long-standing interests on the influences shaping place-making in the United States (U.S.) and Western Europe (see Amith, 2005; Juan, 2005;Fortier, 2000;Ryan et al., 2008).Migrant place-making has been recognised as a way for migrants to forge and assert a collective identity amongst host populations, and particularly when faced with issues of discrimination (Castles and Davidson 2009;Gill, 2010). In addition, place-making amongst migrant populations can be understood as a mechanism -both physically and conceptually -to establish the validity and aspirations of a new community (Gill 2010).However, place-making can be both constructive and destructive. It can provide the opportunity for migrants to retain a national identity in their destination countries, lead to conflict and issues of exclusion, alienation, resistance and can become a catalyst for racism (Amith, 200...