Objective To assess the impact of adopting the st biometry standards in a Chinese population.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting A teaching hospital in Hong Kong.Population A total of 10 527 Chinese women with a singleton pregnancy having a second-or third-trimester fetal anomaly or growth scan between January 2009 and June 2014.Methods Z-scores were derived for fetal abdominal circumference (AC), head circumference (HC), and femur length (FL) using the INTERGROWTH-21 st and Chinese biometry standards.Pregnancies with aneuploidy, structural or skeletal abnormalities, or that developed pre-eclampsia were excluded. Z-scores were stratified as <2.5th, <5th, <10th, >90th, >95th, or >97.5th percentile. Birthweight centile, adjusted for gestation and gender, was categorised as ≤3rd, 3rd to ≤5th, 5th to ≤10th, and >10th. Pairwise comparison and the McNemar test were performed to assess biometry Z-score differences and concordance between the INTERGROWTH-21 st and Chinese standards.Main outcome measures The sensitivity of both the local and INTERGROWTH-21 st AC standards to identify pregnancies that were small-for-gestational-age (SGA) was assessed.Results INTERGROWTH-21 st AC, HC, and FL Z-scores were significantly lower than those obtained using our local reference for AC, HC, and FL (P < 0.0001 for all). The proportion of fetuses with biometry in the <2.5th, <5th, <10th, >90th, >95th, or >97.5th percentiles was statistically significant (P < 0.01 for all