1988
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198812000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic Differences in Seclusion and Restraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study are generally consistent with previous research on restraint use in medical facilities but differ from previous research in psychiatric facilities. Unlike previous research in psychiatric facilities, 1,3,17‐20 this study found that patients with a psychotic or bipolar disorder (manic episode) were no more likely to be restrained than patients with other diagnoses. Patients were more likely to be restrained if they were diagnosed with dementia similar to the findings of Robbins et al 11 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…The findings of this study are generally consistent with previous research on restraint use in medical facilities but differ from previous research in psychiatric facilities. Unlike previous research in psychiatric facilities, 1,3,17‐20 this study found that patients with a psychotic or bipolar disorder (manic episode) were no more likely to be restrained than patients with other diagnoses. Patients were more likely to be restrained if they were diagnosed with dementia similar to the findings of Robbins et al 11 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…However, race ceased to be significant when the data were analysed according to age group. The authors suggest that high numbers of young, black patients may therefore account for apparent racial bias (Carpenter et al, 1988). A similar result was reported in a replication of this study (Forquer et al, 1996).…”
Section: Socio Demographic Factorssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Previous psychiatric and gerontologic research about the use of restraints has focused almost entirely on (a) identifying the precipitants to the restraining of patients (Bornstein, 1985;DiFabio, 1981;Guirguis & Durost, 1978;Phillips & Nasr, 1983;Roper, Coutts, Sather, & Taylor, 1985;Sheridan, Henrion, Robinson , & Baxter, 1990;Soloff, 1978Soloff, , 1979Telintelo, Kuhlm an, & Wing, 1983;Way, 1986), (b) the reasons for restraining patients (Berland, Wachtel, Kiel, O' Sullivan, & Phillips, 1990;Burton, German, Rouner, Brant, & Clark, 1992;Ramprogus & Gibson, 1991;Robbins et al, 1987;Strum pf & Evans, 1988;Tinnetti, Lui, & Ginter, 1992), and (c) characteristics of the patient that indicate a potential need for physic al restraint (Berland et al, 1990;Bornstein, 1985;Burton et al, 1992;Carpenter, Hannon, McCleery, & Wanderling, 1988;DiFabio, 1981;Lofgren , MacPherson, Granieri, Myllenbeck, & Sprafka, 1989;Phillips & Nasr, 1983;Robbins et al, 1987;Roper et al, 1985;Sheridan et al, 1990;Tinnetti et al, 1992;Way & Banks, 1990). …”
Section: Previo Us Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%