1996
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic differences in the outcome of serum screening for Down's syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gilbert et al, 1996), with more false-positives in ethnic minorities, which lead to unnecessary anxiety and invasive investigations.…”
Section: Learning Disability In Ethnic Minority Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilbert et al, 1996), with more false-positives in ethnic minorities, which lead to unnecessary anxiety and invasive investigations.…”
Section: Learning Disability In Ethnic Minority Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be an unduly optimistic figure in populations with a high proportion of South Asians. Gilbert et al 5 reported a 27% uptake of amniocentesis in Indian Asians and Wald et al 2 reported a 42% uptake in the Bangladeshi ethnic group. Such figures would adversely affect prevention of Down's syndrome births and prejudice the public health benefits of screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDITOR,—Lucy Gilbert and colleagues report a 3.5-fold increase in the proportion of women found to be positive on screening for Down's syndrome when rates among Indian Asian women were compared with those among white women 1. This prompted me to examine the data from Oldchurch Hospital's screening programme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%