1978
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.40.7.789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic group comparisons of variables associated with ischaemic heart disease.

Abstract: SUMMARY Variables known or postulated as being associated with the onset of ischaemic heart disease have been measured in 553 male and female members, aged 18 to 49, of a working population in northwest London; 412 were white, and 141 were black. Cigarette and alcohol consumption were higher in white than in black men, and so were cholesterol, triglyceride, factor VII, carbon monoxide, and haemoglobin levels, and platelet and white cell counts; factor VIII and blood pressure levels, and fibrinolytic activity w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,16 Three studies 5,10,16 were designed specifically to compare BP levels; the rest had broad aims relating to a range of cardiovascular risk factors. Name analysis, 9,11 self-reported origin, 9,13,14 country of birth, 3,6,7,9 parental origin, 8,10,11,15 and observer classification 5,12,16 were used as indicators of ethnicity. One study did not state which indicator of ethnicity was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9,16 Three studies 5,10,16 were designed specifically to compare BP levels; the rest had broad aims relating to a range of cardiovascular risk factors. Name analysis, 9,11 self-reported origin, 9,13,14 country of birth, 3,6,7,9 parental origin, 8,10,11,15 and observer classification 5,12,16 were used as indicators of ethnicity. One study did not state which indicator of ethnicity was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest, most representative and most up-to-date study was the Health Survey for England '99. 14 Table 2 shows that BPs were measured in three studies in a workplace, [3][4][5] in three studies at the participants' own homes, 7,13,14 in four studies in a health centre, 6,8,10,15 in one study in a hospital clinic 11 and in one study in a hospital clinic and in a workplace. 9 In six studies, BP was measured with a random zero sphygmomanometer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] In four of these, mean BP levels were not adjusted for age, [12][13][14][15] and one study based on the health Survey for England (the availability of data from two Health Surveys for England made this study unnecessary) did not provide information on standard deviations nor 95% CI to enable quantitative analyses. 15 One study did not provide information on BP values.…”
Section: Study Selection and Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%