1990
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.1310020613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic variation in the size of infant at birth

Abstract: The impact of ethnicity and other maternal factors (BMI, parity, glucose tolerance, gestational age) on the size of the infant at birth was investigated in a relatively low socioeconomic status, multi-ethnic population at San Francisco General Hospital. A sample of 2,069 infants born to mothers of black, non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, and Chinese descent and whose mothers had received prenatal care at San Francisco General Hospital were studied. Maternal size, pregnancy history, and blood glucose were determine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all researched groups without exclusion the mean values of body mass at birth are within standard deviation for boys and girls recommended by the WHO. Length and weight at birth among newborns from East and West Siberia exceed not only the mean values suggested by the WHO, but also mean total body sizes of American newborns of corresponding race groups [8]. Length and weight of Russian infants of West Siberia is only a little bigger than corresponding measures of European Americans in California.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In all researched groups without exclusion the mean values of body mass at birth are within standard deviation for boys and girls recommended by the WHO. Length and weight at birth among newborns from East and West Siberia exceed not only the mean values suggested by the WHO, but also mean total body sizes of American newborns of corresponding race groups [8]. Length and weight of Russian infants of West Siberia is only a little bigger than corresponding measures of European Americans in California.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Maternal education and occupation, social class, maternal marital status, income, race/ethnicity, rural/ urban place of residence, maternal drinking and smoking habits, or even lower neighborhood status are considered the main factors significantly impacting birth outcomes. Researchers have emphasized that low SES translates to poor health awareness, lack and/or insufficient medical care during pregnancy, poor food quality, and higher levels of stress, which significantly affects the course and termination of pregnancy, and thus the perinatal status of new‐borns (e.g., Clayborne et al, 2017; Din‐Dzietham & Hertz‐Picciotto, 1998; Gage et al, 2013; Janevic et al, 2011; Joseph et al, 2007; Kramer, 1987; Little, 1990; Luo et al, 2004; Nobile et al, 2007; Osypuk et al, 2010; Schumacher et al, 1990; Shah et al, 2000; Shah et al, 2011; Shiono et al, 1997; Shoham‐Yakubovich & Barel, 1988; Torres‐Arreola et al, 2005). Moreover, women of lower SES have greater exposure to stress resulting from poor living conditions, unemployment, limited access to food, and so on, which are in turn increase the likelihood of adverse birth outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and infants small for gestational age (Campbell & Seabrook, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%