Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan

Abstract

Taiwan is a divided society; divided along the lines of ethnicity and national identity. During much of the 1980s and earlier, ethnicity played an important role for the opposition movement to mobilize popular support in fighting for democracy, but as Taiwan becomes democratic, national identity turns out to be more salient than ethnicity in shaping political competition on the island. As shown by survey data, national identity is indeed the dominant cleavage underpinning Taiwan’s party system. And since there is a high degree of stability in the distribution of the popular attitude toward the national identity issue, we also witness a relatively stable alignment between the two major political groupings, the pan-Kuomintang (KMT) and pan-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) camps, even though there have been splits within each camp. Although such a cleavage is highly contentious, and could bring about serious conflicts in the society, thus far, as a result of the convergence toward the middle point, namely, the status quo, and the threat of a formidable enemy across the Taiwan Strait, the situation has not got out of hand. Since the division between Taiwan and China may not be easily resolved, national identity will remain a major political issue in Taiwan for years to come.

In search of linguistic identities in Taiwan: an empirical study

“…Findings show that Taiwanese identity does associate significantly with support for the pan-Green, and is inversely correlated to pan-Blue support. Moreover, introducing the variable of national identity renders the relationship between speaking Taiwanese and supporting the pan-Green insignificant, thus supporting Hsieh's (2005) interpretation. The problem with this interpretation, however, is that national identity has its own determinants.…”

Understanding the Rules of the Game: Evidence From Taiwan's Mixed Legislative System

“…Controls for age, gender, and education are also included. Following the literature on Taiwanese politics (Copper, ; Hsieh, , ; Huang, ), controls for national identity and preference for Taiwan's future status are also included. In terms of political identity, dummy variables are included for Chinese and Taiwanese (leaving those who identified as both as the baseline).…”

Is the Age of Party Democracy Over or Are Parties Entering a New Renaissance?

“…While Spain have a familiar left-right cleavage structure which has strained under varying degrees of neoliberalism, the salient political divide in Taiwan has remained one of unification-independence and the NPP has been one of the most vocal parties for independence. Taiwan has carried out neoliberal policies at the hands of both of the major parties (Chen and Li 2011; Hsu 2009); however, the salience of these policies have remained in the shadow of the dominant unification-independence cleavage and the attendant identity issues they bring to the fore (Hsieh 2005;McAllister 2016;Tsai 2016). Although the unificationindependence debate may also implicate concerns about the Taiwanese economy, unlike the Spanish case, this cleavage is not itself a matter of the kind of involvement that a government should have in the operation of the economy.…”