1998
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a007947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnicity, Patronage and the African State: The Politics of Uncivil Nationalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
148
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Group identity based on ethnic structure and practice is also contested in the historiography of ethnicity. Berman writes, ethnicities are "ambiguous, constantly contested and changing results of cultural politics; they are the outcomes of an endless process in which they are always simultaneously old and new, they are grounded in the past and perpetually in the process of creation" [50] (pp. 311-312).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group identity based on ethnic structure and practice is also contested in the historiography of ethnicity. Berman writes, ethnicities are "ambiguous, constantly contested and changing results of cultural politics; they are the outcomes of an endless process in which they are always simultaneously old and new, they are grounded in the past and perpetually in the process of creation" [50] (pp. 311-312).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sub-Sahara Africa, elections were, broadly speaking, introduced with decolonization in the mid-twentieth centuryyet again, political marketplaces were generally characterized by high levels of fragmentation. This was primarily due to colonialism, which -as Berman [6] explains -'rested largely on the institutionalization of BBig Man-Small Boy^politics in rural society, built on the hierarchies of personal rule of the Bdecentralized despotism^of chiefs and headmen.' In other words, colonial rule had -by sponsoring local strongmen -led to a large number of powerful loyalty sellers whose support in electoral contests could only be secured by keeping formal institutions weak and providing ample opportunities for corruption.…”
Section: Comparative Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of Africa after the Cold War, states tend to be governed by authoritarian regimes or unconsolidated democracies with weak or fragmented institutions, and often lack a firm control over parts of their territory as well as strong overarching national identities (Herbst, 2000;Jackson, 2002). To gain and remain in power, politicians often rely on patrimonial and clientelist networks and appeal to subsets of the population based on ethnic or religious identity, while employing different measures to contain the threat from potential challengers (Berman, 1998;Cederman, Wimmer & Min, 2010;de Mesquita et al, 2005). The state's authority and power may depend on the support of some groups and be upheld through the marginalization of other groups (Raleigh 2010;Wimmer 2004).…”
Section: Strategic Interests and Intervention In Communal Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%