Ethno-religious neighbourhood infrastructures and the life satisfaction of immigrants and their descendants in Germany

Abstract

Urban research assigns immigrant enclaves an ambiguous role. While such areas are seen as rich in beneficial ethno-religious infrastructures and networks, they also tend to be located in deprived and stigmatised inner-city neighbourhoods. Research on neighbourhood attainment provides evidence for both, a desire to attain mainstream middle-class neighbourhoods, which grows the more immigrants and their descendants establish themselves in society, but also a continuing attraction of residing close to co-ethnics. To tease apart this ambiguity, we study how the life satisfaction of immigrants and their descendants depends on the characteristics of the neighbourhood they live in, and pay special attention to heterogeneity along generation, country of origin orientation and income. We use classic measures of neighbourhood quality vis-à-vis newly collected data on the spatial density of ethno-religious minority associations, places of worship and grocers. We link these data to the geocoded German Socio-Economic Panel to predict life satisfaction among immigrants and their descendants. To strengthen a causal interpretation of our results, we employ specifications that address self-selection into neighbourhoods and unobserved confounding. Contra the assumptions of standard assimilation models, we document that ethno-religious infrastructures contribute to increased life satisfaction primarily among the second generation, and there especially among sending-country oriented individuals. This suggests a continuing importance of origin-culture infrastructures for some groups. Furthermore, we find little evidence that overall neighbourhood quality, or the mere share of co-ethnics in a neighbourhood, increases life satisfaction either among immigrants or their descendants.

Religion, personality traits and the nature of entrepreneurial activities: insights from Scottish Muslim entrepreneurs

“…The focus on geographical proximity in prior studies ignores other forms of proximity such as cognitive, organisational, social, cultural and institutional (Kuttim, 2016). Factors like selective migration are likely to lead to a correlation of different forms of proximity as those of similar personality types and from similar backgrounds, including ethnic and religious characteristics, are drawn to particular areas (Wiedner et al. , 2022).…”

Spatial overlap: Trade-offs in Refugees’ Residential Choices

“…Among these are general support networks that provide aid in navigating an unknown society and its public administration (Hall, King, and Finlay 2017;Wessendorf and Phillimore 2019), protection against discrimination (Phillips 2006), community monitoring supporting the educational attainment of children (Zhou 2009). Other benefits are ethno-religious minority infrastructure in terms of places of worship, associations and business (Wiedner, Schaeffer, and Carol 2022). Social scientists have long argued that these benefits help newcomers in getting a foothold in a new setting and thereby actually contribute to eventual socio-economic integration (Hanhörster and Wessendorf 2020;Park and Burgess 1921).…”

Breathing Unequal Air: Environmental Disadvantage and Residential Sorting of Immigrant Minorities in England and Germany

“…Still, there might be a trade-off between different neighbourhood characteristics in the sense that some characteristics may be more important for immigrants than for nonimmigrants. Previous research has documented the tendency of immigrants to live among co-ethnic peers (Eckerd et al 2012;Mossaad et al 2020;Wiedner et al 2022) or in ethnic enclaves (Logan et al 2002). As areas with a high share of ethnic minorities are often located in inner city areas, this "chain migration" might restrict minorities' access to more suburban or rural areas with lower levels of air pollution.…”