2017
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2016.1259583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnogenesis and surplus food production: communitas and identity building among nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Ilchamus, Lake Baringo, Kenya

Abstract: Most archaeological discussions of surplus production tend to focus either on its role in the emergence and maintenance of social complexity (whether among hunter-gatherers, farming communities or incipient states), or on the enabling properties of surplus as a basis for technological advances and aesthetic elaboration. Here, we offer a rather different perspective on surplus as an initiator of communitas and driver of ethnogenesis following a period of intense socio-ecological stress, environmental degradatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maasai in Amboseli today recount that during the 1800s groups of Maasai, many of them from Tanzania, moved into Amboseli and the pastoralists they encountered were assimilated, migrated elsewhere, or killed. Regional paleoenvironmental reconstructions are now also indicating a drought of acute severity at the turn of the nineteenth century (Verschuren et al, 2000) with a number of social consequences for pastoral communities (Sobania, 1980;Anderson, 2016;Petek and Lane, 2016). It may be no coincidence that the Loikop Wars began toward the end of the 1830s, coinciding with the recovery of lake levels immediately following the intense drought and a corresponding recovery of rangeland (Anderson, 2016).…”
Section: Emergence Of Farming Communities (C 2 Ka Bp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maasai in Amboseli today recount that during the 1800s groups of Maasai, many of them from Tanzania, moved into Amboseli and the pastoralists they encountered were assimilated, migrated elsewhere, or killed. Regional paleoenvironmental reconstructions are now also indicating a drought of acute severity at the turn of the nineteenth century (Verschuren et al, 2000) with a number of social consequences for pastoral communities (Sobania, 1980;Anderson, 2016;Petek and Lane, 2016). It may be no coincidence that the Loikop Wars began toward the end of the 1830s, coinciding with the recovery of lake levels immediately following the intense drought and a corresponding recovery of rangeland (Anderson, 2016).…”
Section: Emergence Of Farming Communities (C 2 Ka Bp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By around the 1830s, the drought was ending and conditions began to ameliorate. It was around that time that small groups from the surrounding hills joined an established community on the southern lowlands, eventually forming the Ilchamus ethnic community (Petek & Lane 2017). Other groups continued to immigrate to Ilchamus throughout the nineteenth century, the majority of whom settled in two villages known as Ilchamus Leabori and Ilchamus Lekeper.…”
Section: Weathering Change Around Lake Baringo Kenyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narratives of pastoral overgrazing in Baringo emerged during the severe droughts and locust infestations of the 1920s, when colonial officials began to question why the region, once famous as a granary due to its irrigated field systems, could not sustain its own population (Anderson 2002;Petek and Lane 2017). The notion that Baringo could be restored to a prior fertility was propagated in the following decades during deliberations about the expansion of the native reserve and developments such as the Perkerra Irrigation Scheme (Kramm 2015).…”
Section: Case Study 2: Baringomentioning
confidence: 99%