Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people

Abstract

ObjectivesQuality improvement projects to address transitions of care across care boundaries are increasingly common but meet with mixed success for reasons that are poorly understood. We aimed to characterise challenges in a project to improve transitions for older people between hospital and care homes.DesignIndependent process evaluation, using ethnographic observations and interviews, of a quality improvement project.Setting and participantsAn English hospital and two residential care homes for older people.Data32 hours of non-participant observations and 12 semistructured interviews with project members, hospital and care home staff.ResultsA hospital-based improvement team sought to reduce unplanned readmissions from residential care homes using interventions including a community-based geriatric team that could be accessed directly by care homes and a communication tool intended to facilitate transfer of information between homes and hospital. Only very modest (if any) impacts of these interventions on readmission rates could be detected. The process evaluation identified multiple challenges in implementing interventions and securing improvement. Many of these arose because of lack of consensus on the nature of the problem and the proper solutions: while the hospital team was keen to reduce readmissions and saw the problems as lying in poor communication and lack of community-based support for care homes, the care home staff had different priorities. Care home staff were unconvinced that the improvement interventions were aligned with their needs or addressed their concerns, resulting in compromised implementation.ConclusionsProcess evaluations have a valuable role in quality improvement. Our study suggests that a key task for quality improvement projects aimed at transitions of care is that of developing a shared view of the problem to be addressed. A more participatory approach could help to surface assumptions, interpretations and interests and could facilitate the coproduction of solutions. This finding is likely to have broader applicability.

The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review

“…An example commonly mentioned was the alignment of national priorities to local work/improvement contexts or vice-versa [49,53,63]. However, misalignment of QI programme goals to local conditions/priorities, or an inability to achieve fit, was also highlighted [37,38,43,61,70] as a challenge when a mismatch between features of programme design/delivery and implementation contexts occurred.…”

Implementing new models of care: Lessons from the new care models programme in England

“…Lessons 1 to 6 suggest first focusing on a specific population and its needs, building in time for developing a shared understanding of problems 20 and co-designing new pathways with patients and their families. Gathering data and bringing stakeholders together is also a key to ensuring that areas can understand and adapt to local context.…”

What have we learnt after 15 years of research into the ‘weekend effect’?

“…However, healthcare is a complex adaptive system, and there are many cautionary tales of where increased performance against process metrics did not lead to the anticipated improvements in outcomes 24. Part of the challenge is that, often, the root causes of problems differ according to local context, and initiatives can fail without sufficient investment in understanding the nature of the specific problems faced in each locality 25. Furthermore, efforts to address systems-level problems like the weekend effect need to think beyond the walls of hospitals.…”