“…Similar concerns apply to humour studies (Attardo, 2014;Bell, 2015;Ruiz-Gurillo, 2016), a vibrant interdisciplinary field which is already labouring under the burden of the Anglo origins of its constitutive term "humour" and the danger of slippage between first-order and second-order concepts that go by the same name. If there is to be any prospect of "de-Anglicising" humour studies, the research field needs to be re-framed in terms of, roughly speaking, "social laughter" or "laughing with other people" (Goddard, 2018b(Goddard, , 2020Goddard and Mullan, 2020) to local metapragmatic words and categories (Levisen, 2018(Levisen, , 2019a(Levisen, , 2019bArab, 2020).…”