2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-006-9050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnosciences––A step towards the integration of scientific and indigenous forms of knowledge in the management of natural resources for the future

Abstract: Integration of indigenous knowledge and ethnoscientific approaches into contemporary frameworks for conservation and sustainable management of natural resources will become increasingly important in policies on an international and national level, both in countries that are industrialised and those that have a developing status. We set the scene on how this can be done by exploring the key conditions and dimensions of a dialogue between 'ontologies' and the roles, which ethnosciences could play in this process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
107
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Its characteristics are consistent with the ones found in many other Andean traditional communities (e.g. Estermann 1998;Platt 1992;Rist and Dahdouh-Guebas 2006;Van den Berg 1990) and include 1) beliefs related to places and spiritual beings with an ideal of integral land occupation and use (see also , 2) a relational rather than instrumental perspective on the landscape, as observed in other indigenous social-ecological contexts, such as the Rarámuri landscape in Northern Mexico (Wyndham 2009), 3) a cyclical perception of time and space, which expresses the cultural bonds to cropfallow rotation and grazing cycle practices , and 4) a view that does not postulate a fundamental separation between nature and culture, as highlighted for many indigenous societies (Descola 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Its characteristics are consistent with the ones found in many other Andean traditional communities (e.g. Estermann 1998;Platt 1992;Rist and Dahdouh-Guebas 2006;Van den Berg 1990) and include 1) beliefs related to places and spiritual beings with an ideal of integral land occupation and use (see also , 2) a relational rather than instrumental perspective on the landscape, as observed in other indigenous social-ecological contexts, such as the Rarámuri landscape in Northern Mexico (Wyndham 2009), 3) a cyclical perception of time and space, which expresses the cultural bonds to cropfallow rotation and grazing cycle practices , and 4) a view that does not postulate a fundamental separation between nature and culture, as highlighted for many indigenous societies (Descola 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Associating phenomena with the agency of natural or spiritual entities can be interpreted as knowledge that addresses multiple and complex causes of phenomena. In this sense, Quechua indigenous knowledge interprets complex causality, focusing on the meaning rather than on the detailed explanation of a phenomenon (Rist and Dadouh-Guebas 2006). Similar concepts of causality are also found among other indigenous groups (Berkes 2012a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Mangroves offer provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services [4][5][6]. Provisioning services are the most commonly appreciated and include sources of timber, fibers and nonwoody products, fuels (firewood and charcoal), food (fisheries), biochemical products, and freshwater; however, the role of mangroves in climatic and hydrologic modulation, erosion control, protection against natural hazards, soil formation, and nutrient cycling has been recently recognized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%