1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)32325-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etiological Spectrum of Post-Transfusion Hepatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
5

Year Published

1977
1977
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure should also indicate the proportion of pregnant women harbouring agents capable of causing hepatitis and should correspond to the frequency of subclinical hepatitis after blood transfusion-also 5-10% (Hampers et al, 1964;Creutzfeldt et al, 1966;Proskey et al, 1970). This figure is much higher than the frequency of HBs antigenaemia, and other agents must be proposed in addition to the hepatitis B (Knodell et al, 1975). Intrauterine transfusions in severe HDN should raise the frequency of the 'inspissated bile syndrome' by exposing the fetus to donor blood in addition to the mother-this is also true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This figure should also indicate the proportion of pregnant women harbouring agents capable of causing hepatitis and should correspond to the frequency of subclinical hepatitis after blood transfusion-also 5-10% (Hampers et al, 1964;Creutzfeldt et al, 1966;Proskey et al, 1970). This figure is much higher than the frequency of HBs antigenaemia, and other agents must be proposed in addition to the hepatitis B (Knodell et al, 1975). Intrauterine transfusions in severe HDN should raise the frequency of the 'inspissated bile syndrome' by exposing the fetus to donor blood in addition to the mother-this is also true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A significant proportion of sporadic hepatitis has also been attributed serologically to HAV. On the other hand, although HAV can be transmitted experimentally by parenteral inoculation, type A hepatitis has not been confirmed serologically as a significant contribution to transfusion-associated hepatitis Knodell et al, 1975), haemodialysis-associated hepatitis (Zuckerman, Courouce and Szmuness, unpublished data), drug abuse-related hepatitis (Mosley et al, 1977), or other forms of percutaneous transmission via blood and , 292, 1141. 1975.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of these sensitive tests revealed that many transfusionassociated cases were not caused by HBV, and recent serological testing for anti-HA has failed to incriminate HAV also Knodell et al, 1975). Cases of hepatitis which are serologically neither type A nor type B also occur among drug abusers (Mosley et al, 1977), haemodialysis patients (Zuckerman and Courouce, unpublished data), intrafamily contacts , and intrainstitutional contacts (Ogra, unpublished data).…”
Section: Viral Hepatitis Type Non-a Non-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, serological prescreening of blood donors for HBV antigens resulted in only moderate reductions in the frequency of posttransfusion hepatitis, suggesting that a second, parenterally transmitted hepatitis agent might exist in the population. Serological analysis confirmed that the etiological agent in approximately 90% of the remaining hepatitis cases was neither HAV nor HBV [4]. In 1978, the NANBH agent was shown to be transmissible to chimpanzees, as evidenced by the development of liver pathology such as characteristic, cytoplasmic tubular structures [5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%