The role of serology in the setting of PCR-based diagnosis of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is unclear. We found that acuteand convalescent-phase paired-sample serologic testing increased the diagnostic yield of naso/oropharyngeal swabs for influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus, adenovirus, and parainfluenza viruses beyond PCR by 0.4% to 10.7%. Although still limited for clinical use, serology, along with PCR, can maximize etiologic diagnosis in epidemiologic studies.
Serology was until recently the principal method for diagnosing viral pneumonia (1-6). Serology, however, can yield false-negative results if the collection of acute-or convalescent-phase blood samples is delayed or too early (4). Moreover, serology is logistically cumbersome and clinically uninformative, because people must return several weeks after the acute illness has resolved (if they survive) for convalescent-phase blood collection. The advent of nucleic acid-based tests (e.g., PCR) of upper respiratory tract specimens offers sensitive, timely diagnostic alternatives (6). The role of serologic testing in the setting of PCR-based diagnosis is unclear.We enrolled persons that were Ն5 years old (median, 11.0 years; range, 5 to 81 years) presenting with acute respiratory illness, defined as cough, difficulty breathing, or chest pain and a documented temperature of Ն38.0°C or oxygen saturation of Ͻ90%, in rural western Kenya from 1 January 2009 and 28 February 2010 (7). At the time of presentation to the clinic, we collected acute-phase blood and nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimens in viral transport media. Patients were asked to return 4 to 6 weeks later for a convalescent-phase serum blood draw. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of specimens was carried out for adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus (hMPV), influenza A and B viruses, and parainfluenza virus (PIV) types 1 to 3 using singleplex qRT-PCR assay (7,8). The qRT-PCR results were considered positive if the threshold cycle (C T ) was Ͻ40.0. Paired sera were tested for antibodies to influenza viruses using hemagglutination inhibition assays and for antibodies to RSV, hMPV, adenovirus, and PIV using standard methods for indirect IgG enzyme-linked immunoassay, in which all assays were optimized for reagent/ diluent composition and concentration and incubation time/ temperatures to obtain the highest limit of detection for anti- a The study was performed on samples collected from individuals in western Kenya. The samples were collected 1 January 2009 to 28 February 2010. The median number of days between acute-and convalescent-phase sera was 42, and the range was 32 to 72 days. b Although the acute and convalescent-phase sera for 232 patients were tested for all viruses, the serum samples for fewer of these patients had qRT-PCR results for some pathogens, resulting in lower denominators (i.e., 203 or 204). c One patient was positive for both parainfluenza virus 1 and parainfluenza vir...