Etnični »stereotipi« v zgodnjenovoveški Evropi:  ruska in turška narodna noša

Janžekovič, Izidor

doi:10.56420/zgodovinskicasopis.2021.3-4.04

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ti so služili kot predloge pri opisovanju navad Hunov in Avarov, kar otežuje ločevanje dejstev med aktualne ali anahronistične (Fasoli 1945, 12-13). Etnični stereotipi imajo dolgo brado, saj se pojavljajo še v renesansi in zgodnjem novem veku ( Janžekovič 2021b( Janžekovič , 2021c( Janžekovič , 2022.…”

Section: Uveljavitev Fevdalnega Redaunclassified

Slovansko svetišče ali srednjeveški stolp? Ozadje najspornejših arheoloških izkopavanj v povojni Jugoslaviji in interpretacija odkritega objekta

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Slovansko svetišče ali srednjeveški stolp? Uvod V se države, in ne samo totalitarne, sledijo sloganu Partije iz romana 1984 Georgea Orwella (1949): »Kdor nadzira preteklost, nadzira prihodnost; kdor nadzira sedanjost, nadzira preteklost.« Med drugim so države želele nadzirati tudi mit o skupni preteklosti. Arheologija je običajno vpeta v državne in nacionalne institucije, saj se zanaša na financiranje nacionalnih držav, kar se sicer v zadnjih desetletjih z načelom »plača povzročitelj obremenitve« (polluter pays) počasi spreminja. Vpliv nacionalnih ideologij na arheološko misel in prakso je precej dobro raziskan (Fowler 1987;

show abstract

Section: Uveljavitev Fevdalnega Redaunclassified

Slovansko svetišče ali srednjeveški stolp? Ozadje najspornejših arheoloških izkopavanj v povojni Jugoslaviji in interpretacija odkritega objekta

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Jedan od fizičkih antropologa bio je Franjo Ivaniček koji je tokom 1942. godine bio student Eugena Fišera u Berlinu, odnosno bili su potrebni antropolozi koji su imali iskustva sa nemačkim rasnim svetonazorom, iako su morali da prođu izvesno "pranje" biografije. Nakon početnog entuzijazma da se otkriju Sloveni krajem 1940-ih i 1950-ih, otpočelo se sa razvijanjem ideja o odnosu između Slovena koji su doseljeni na Balkan i zatečenog stanovništva (Guštin 2019, 17-26;Janžekovič 2017;. Kao ključna tema o ovom odnosu autohtonih i doseljenika raspravljalo se o pitanju etnogeneze.…”

Section: O 1045unclassified

From Ethnic Determinism to Epistemic Optimism: A Critical History of the Recent Past of Serbian Archaeology

Živaljević

2022

EAP / IEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the history of Serbian archaeology has recently been a vivid field of study from various standpoints, the focus of this research has mainly been upon the early phases of the discipline, while the last thirty years have rarely been discussed. Additionally, the more extreme abuses of archaeological practice for political purposes, although minority positions, but still evident in the recent past, are mainly avoided. Therefore, this paper presents a critical discursive analysis of the recent history of Serbian archaeology in the context of the wars and crises of the 1990s and the post-conflict circumstances. The issue is raised of the transition achieved by Serbian archaeology from the dominance of ethnic determinism, apparent in the majority of archaeological interpretations, to the state of epistemic optimism, as a possible characterisation of the current state. The idea of “the Serbian gromile”, penned by Đorđe Janković, is taken as the case study, focusing on the explanatory mechanisms supporting it. The emergence of this idea is contextualized in the situation of social crisis, war, and trauma, and interpreted on the other hand as a continuation of the tradition of the Slavic archaeology, adhering in Yugoslavia to the culture-historical approach. The interpretation of “the Serbian gromile” offered here is thus specific in arguing that it is not an exception, but the tip of an iceberg – a part of the general tendency of Serbian archaeology in the traditional key. The analysis has revealed that the explanatory mechanism, serving as a scaffold to the interpretation offered by Janković in his search for the early Medieval “Serbian gromile”, was in fact the abuse of interdisciplinarity. Namely, the relationships with ethnology and physical anthropology were problematic in Serbian archaeology under the culture-historical framework, since they were not theoretically explicated and therefore prone to political appropriation. The dark shadow of interdisciplinary unity can only be avoided through the explication of approaches of individual fields of research and their integration, from the research design to the final interpretation. In its new iteration, incorporating social anthropology and bioarchaeology, interdisciplinarity in Serbian archaeology fostered new perspectives in the spirit of epistemic optimism.

show abstract

Etnični »stereotipi« v zgodnjenovoveški Evropi: ruska in turška narodna noša

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Slovansko svetišče ali srednjeveški stolp? Ozadje najspornejših arheoloških izkopavanj v povojni Jugoslaviji in interpretacija odkritega objekta

Slovansko svetišče ali srednjeveški stolp? Ozadje najspornejših arheoloških izkopavanj v povojni Jugoslaviji in interpretacija odkritega objekta

From Ethnic Determinism to Epistemic Optimism: A Critical History of the Recent Past of Serbian Archaeology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About